Cited by 37Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Education

Chatbots in Healthcare Curricula: The Case of a Conversational Virtual Patient

Dolianiti, Foteini, Tsoupouroglou, Iraklis, Antoniou, Panagiotis, Konstantinidis, Stathis, Anastasiades, Savvas, Bamidis, Panagiotis·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_15

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of chatbots has been increasingly reported; Gorashi et al. analyzed their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in this context; chatbots have assisted students in history-taking practice and preparing for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE); in one study comparing the use of ChatGPT with a traditional textbook for learning medical terminology, ChatGPT provided

    “The use of chatbots has been increasingly reported [40, 112–115]. Gorashi et al. analyzed their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in this context [107]. Chatbots have assisted students in history-taking practice [116] and preparing for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) [117]. In one study comparing the use of ChatGPT with a traditional textbook for learning medical”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dolianiti, F., Tsoupouroglou, I., Antoniou, P., Konstantinidis, S., Anastasiades, S., & Bamidis, P.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Antoniou, Panagiotis
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
137-147
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3090450303
Cited by
37
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
chatbots, medical education, thromboembolism, clinical decision-making, natural language processing, machine learning in education, participatory design, co-creation, requirement elicitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review