Cited by 69Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSpinal Cord Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The Role of Negative Cognitive Appraisals in PTSD Symptoms Following Spinal Cord Injuries

Agar, Elenor, Kennedy, Paul, King, Nigel S.·2006·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate factors associated with persistent Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In the context of a cognitive model, it sought to determine how influential cognitive appraisals were in predicting persistent PTSD when compared to other known predictor variables in the literature such as injury severity. A sample of 50 inpatients receiving rehabilitation for SCI who were 3–24 months post-injury were interviewed using a series of standardized measures of PTSD symptoms and diagnosis, post-traumatic cognitive appraisals, social support, and injury severity. For PTSD symptoms, significant relationships were found for greater injury severity, lower satisfaction with social support and more negative cognitions. Negative cognitions were found to predict variance in PTSD symptoms over and above the non-cognitive variables, although gender and injury severity were also predictors. The only significant predictor of PTSD diagnosis was the cognitive sub-scale “negative cognitions about the self”. Cognitive appraisals were found to be important predictors of persisting PTSD in an SCI population. This supports the cognitive model of PTSD and the development of cognitive therapies for PTSD in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465806002943

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agar, E., Kennedy, P., & King, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2006-05-02
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
437-452
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2167714369
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, spinal cord injury, cognitive appraisal, negative thinking, injury severity, social support, predictors of PTSD, cognitive therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review