The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention
Abstract
A range of tests of everyday attention is described, based on ecologically plausible activities such as searching maps, looking through telephone directories, and listening to lottery number broadcasts. An age-, sex- and IQ-stratified sample of 154 normal participants was given these tests, along with a number of existing tests of attention. The factor structure revealed by this data set matched well contemporary evidence for a set of functionally independent attentional circuits in the brain, and included factors for sustained attention, selective attention, attentional switching and auditory-verbal working memory. The Test of Everyday Attention (TEA), which was developed and standardized on the basis of these subtests, has three parallel forms, high test-retest reliability, and correlates significantly with existing measures of attention. Furthermore, selected subtests successfully discriminate among a number of brain-impaired groups, including closed head injury versus age-matched controls, minimal versus mild Alzheimer’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy patients versus age-matched controls. (JINS, 1996, 2, 525–534.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.1.256 · Cited by 1,495
Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography
Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349061a0 · Cited by 1,284
Frontal lesions and sustained attention
Wilkins, A. J., Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1987) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90024-8 · Cited by 450
Modelling dementia: Effects of scopolamine on memory and attention
Broks, P., Preston, G. C., Traub, M., Poppleton, P., Ward, C., & Stahl, S. M. (1988) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90004-8 · Cited by 220
Right hemisphere processing superiority during sustained visual attention
Whitehead, R. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.329 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1023/b:nerv.0000009483.91468.fb · Cited by 1,055
The ecological validity of tests of executive function
BURGESS, P. W., ALDERMAN, N., EVANS, J., EMSLIE, H., & WILSON, B. A. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798466037 · Cited by 932
Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · Cited by 746
Typologies of attentional networks
Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1903 · Cited by 706
Manly, T., Anderson, V., Nimmo‐Smith, I., Turner, A., Watson, P., & Robertson, I. H. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00806 · Cited by 693
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, I. H., Ward, T., Ridgeway, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 525-534
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2151369959
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
