The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate outcome in adults with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) at 1 week and 3 months postinjury and to identify factors associated with persisting problems. A total of 84 adults with mild TBI were compared with 53 adults with other minor injuries as controls in terms of postconcussional symptomatology, behavior, and cognitive performance at 1 week and 3 months postinjury. At 1 week postinjury, adults with mild TBI were reporting symptoms, particularly headaches, dizziness, fatigue, visual disturbance, and memory difficulties. They exhibited slowing of information processing on neuropsychological measures, namely the WAIS–R Digit Symbol subtest and the Speed of Comprehension Test. By 3 months postinjury, the symptoms reported at 1 week had largely resolved, and no impairments were evident on neuropsychological measures. However, there was a subgroup of 24% of participants who were still suffering many symptoms, who were highly distressed, and whose lives were still significantly disrupted. These individuals did not have longer posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) duration. They were more likely to have a history of previous head injury, neurological or psychiatric problems, to be students, females, and to have been injured in a motor vehicle accident. The majority were showing significant levels of psychopathology. A range of factors, other than those directly reflecting the severity of injury, appear to be associated with outcome following mild TBI. (JINS, 2000, 6, 568–579.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carroll, L., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., & Pépin, M. (2004) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501960410023859 · Cited by 1,326
BELANGER, H. G., CURTISS, G., DEMERY, J. A., LEBOWITZ, B. K., & VANDERPLOEG, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050277 · Cited by 715
A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning
Schretlen, D. J., & Shapiro, A. M. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260310001606728 · Cited by 645
Epidemiology of Postconcussion Syndrome in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Barlow, K. M., Crawford, S., Stevenson, A., Sandhu, S. S., Belanger, F., & Dewey, D. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0925 · Cited by 573
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review
McInnes, K., Friesen, C. L., MacKenzie, D. E., Westwood, D. A., & Boe, S. G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174847 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- PONSFORD, J., WILLMOTT, C., ROTHWELL, A., CAMERON, P., KELLY, A.-M., NELMS, R., CURRAN, C., & NG, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 568-579
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2145469544
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355617700655066
- The paper
- PONSFORD, J., WILLMOTT, C., ROTHWELL, A., CAMERON, P., KELLY, A.-M., NELMS, R., CURRAN, C., & NG, K. (2000). Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617700655066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.