Cited by 122Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion

Open access
Bernstein, Daniel M.·2002·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Recovery of cognitive function after mild head injury (MHI) is thought to be relatively swift and complete. The present study replicates and extends previous work in which university students with self-reported concussion demonstrated reduced P300 amplitude on a set of easy and difficult attention tasks, in addition to performing more poorly than controls on demanding cognitive tasks many years after injury. In the present study, 13 students with self-reported concussion (MHI group: M time since injury = 8 years) and 10 controls were matched for age, sex, education, and a variety of cognitive, physical and emotional complaints. Controls outperformed the MHI group on the Digit Symbol substitution task and on a difficult dual task involving tone discrimination and visual working memory. Additionally, controls exhibited larger P300 amplitudes on both an easy and a difficult auditory discrimination task. A combination of electrophysiological, neuropsychological and self-report indices predicted group membership (MHI vs. control) with 88% accuracy. The present results, coupled with previous work, offer preliminary evidence that the combination of event-related potentials and demanding behavioral measures might reveal long-lasting, subtle cognitive problems associated with MHI. These findings may challenge existing notions of complete recovery after MHI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617702801400

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EEG studies have demonstrated differences in ERP amplitude, increased alpha power, and poor fronto-parietal coherence during verbal and visuospatial working memory tasks in mTBI.

    “Using EEG, differences in the amplitude of event-related potentials (ERPs) (Bernstein, 2002;Ozen, Itier, Preston, & Fernandes, 2013), increased alpha power (Arakaki et al., 2018) and poor coherence (the temporal dependence of neuronal activity across brain regions) between fronto-parietal regions during verbal and visuospatial working memory tasks has also been demonstrated in mTBI (Cudmore, 2000;”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, D. M.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Daniel M.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2002-07
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
673-682
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2120690165
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, concussion, long-term cognitive impairment, P300 amplitude, event-related potentials, attention, dual-task performance, visual working memory, auditory discrimination, digit symbol substitution, cognitive recovery, university students
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Concussion, Cognition, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review