Cited by 391Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

Neuropsychological sequelae of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome: a critical review

ALOIA, MARK S., ARNEDT, J. TODD, DAVIS, JENNIFER D., RIGGS, RAINE L., BYRD, DESIREE·2004·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a well-recognized clinical sleep disorder that results in chronically fragmented sleep and recurrent hypoxemia. The primary daytime sequelae of the disorder include patient reports of excessive daytime sleepiness, depression, and attention and concentration problems. It has been well established that OSAHS negatively impacts certain aspects of cognitive functioning. The primary goals of this article are to (1) clarify the pattern of cognitive deficits that are specific to OSAHS; (2) identify the specific cognitive domains that improve with treatment; and (3) elucidate the possible mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in OSAHS. At the conclusion of the paper, we propose a potential neurofunctional theory to account for the etiology of cognitive deficits in OSAHS. Thirty-seven peer-reviewed articles were selected for this review. In general, findings were equivocal for most cognitive domains. Treatment, however, was noted to improve attention/vigilance in most studies and consistently did not improve constructional abilities or psychomotor functioning. The results are discussed in the context of a neurofunctional theory for the effects of OSAHS on the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617704105134

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between weight regain and reduced attention likely involves the return of comorbid medical conditions or independent effects of adiposity.

    “The mechanisms for this association likely involve the return of comorbid medical conditions that adversely impact cognitive function (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, sleep apnea) or even from the independent effects of adiposity.28–31”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALOIA, M. S., ARNEDT, J. T., DAVIS, J. D., RIGGS, R. L., & BYRD, D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2004-09
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
772-785
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2030284843
Cited by
391
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL067209, R01 HL67209)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological sequelae, attention and vigilance, excessive daytime sleepiness, hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, depression, constructional ability
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Intelligence, Language, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, MEDLINE, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review