Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion

Open access
McCREA, MICHAEL, BARR, WILLIAM B., GUSKIEWICZ, KEVIN, RANDOLPH, CHRISTOPHER, MARSHALL, STEPHEN W., CANTU, ROBERT, ONATE, JAMES A., KELLY, JAMES P.·2005·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Clinical decision making about an athlete's return to competition after concussion is hampered by a lack of systematic methods to measure recovery. We applied standard regression-based methods to statistically measure individual rates of impairment at several time points after concussion in college football players. Postconcussive symptoms, cognitive functioning, and balance were assessed in 94 players with concussion (based on American Academy of Neurology Criteria) and 56 noninjured controls during preseason baseline testing, and immediately, 3 hr, and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days postinjury. Ninety-five percent of injured players exhibited acute concussion symptoms and impairment on cognitive or balance testing immediately after injury, which diminished to 4% who reported elevated symptoms on postinjury day 7. In addition, a small but clinically significant percentage of players who reported being symptom free by day 2 continued to be classified as impaired on the basis of objective balance and cognitive testing. These data suggest that neuropsychological testing may be of incremental utility to subjective symptom checklists in identifying the residual effects of sport-related concussion. The implementation of neuropsychological testing to detect subtle cognitive impairment is most useful once postconcussive symptoms have resolved. This management model is also supported by practical and other methodological considerations. (JINS, 2005, 11, 58–69.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617705050083

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
McCREA, M., BARR, W. B., GUSKIEWICZ, K., RANDOLPH, C., MARSHALL, S. W., CANTU, R., ONATE, J. A., & KELLY, J. P.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2005-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
58-69
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2102722855
Cited by
373
References
48
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355617705050083
The paper
McCREA, M., BARR, W. B., GUSKIEWICZ, K., RANDOLPH, C., MARSHALL, S. W., CANTU, R., ONATE, J. A., & KELLY, J. P. (2005). Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617705050083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.