Cited by 1,220Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionWinter Sports Injuries and Performance

Unreported Concussion in High School Football Players: Implications for Prevention

McCrea, Michael, Hammeke, Thomas, Olsen, Gary, Leo, Peter, Guskiewicz, Kevin·2004·Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of unreported concussion and estimate more accurately the overall rate of concussion in high school football players. DESIGN: Retrospective, confidential survey completed by all subjects at the end of the football season. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,532 varsity football players from 20 high schools in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, area were surveyed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The structured survey assessed (1) number of concussions before the current season, (2) number of concussions sustained during the current season, (3) whether concussion during the current season was reported, (4) to whom concussion was reported, and (5) reasons for not reporting concussion. RESULTS: Of respondents, 29.9% reported a previous history of concussion, and 15.3% reported sustaining a concussion during the current football season; of those, 47.3% reported their injury. Concussions were reported most frequently to a certified athletic trainer (76.7% of reported injuries). The most common reasons for concussion not being reported included a player not thinking the injury was serious enough to warrant medical attention (66.4% of unreported injuries), motivation not to be withheld from competition (41.0%), and lack of awareness of probable concussion (36.1%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reflect a higher prevalence of concussion in high school football players than previously reported in the literature. The ultimate concern associated with unreported concussion is an athlete's increased risk of cumulative or catastrophic effects from recurrent injury. Future prevention initiatives should focus on education to improve athlete awareness of the signs of concussion and potential risks of unreported injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00042752-200401000-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCrea, M., Hammeke, T., Olsen, G., Leo, P., & Guskiewicz, K.
Affiliations
  • Waukesha Memorial Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Published
2004-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
13-17
ISSN
1050-642X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050073457
Cited by
1,220
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 50
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00058, M01RR000058)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Keywords
concussion, high school football, concussion prevalence, concussion reporting, athletic trainers, reasons for not reporting, concussion awareness, concussion prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Football, Health Promotion, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Retrospective Studies, Wisconsin, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review