Cited by 140Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Functions and Memory

Substantial risk of “Accidental MCI” in healthy older adults: Base rates of low memory scores in neuropsychological assessment

BROOKS, BRIAN L., IVERSON, GRANT L., WHITE, TRAVIS·2007·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

When assessing older adults for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, it is important to understand how often low memory scores are obtained in healthy people in order to minimize false positive diagnoses. This study examines the base rates of low memory scores in older adults across a battery of memory tests. Participants included older adults (55–79 years; N = 742) from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB; Stern & White, 2003a) standardization sample. The NAB Memory Module consists of four co-normed memory tests (i.e., List Learning, Shape Learning, Story Learning, and Daily Living Memory) yielding 10 demographically corrected T-scores. When all 10 T-scores were examined simultaneously, 55.5% of older adults had one or more scores one standard deviation (SD) below the mean. At <1.5 SDs, 30.8% of healthy older adults obtained one or more low memory scores. Obtaining low memory scores occurs more often with lesser intellectual abilities. For example, 56.5% of older adults with low average intellectual abilities obtained one or more low memory scores (<1.5 SDs) compared to 21.1% with high average intellectual abilities. Understanding the base rates of low scores can reduce over-interpretation of isolated low memory scores and minimize false positive diagnoses of MCI. (JINS, 2007, 13, 490–500.)The data in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are original data produced by special permission of the Publisher, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 16204 North Florida Avenue, Lutz, Florida 33549, from the standardization data presented in the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Psychometric and Technical Manual by Travis White, Ph.D. and Robert A. Stern, Ph.D. Copyright 2001, 2003 by PAR, Inc. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission from PAR, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617707070531

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BROOKS, B. L., IVERSON, G. L., & WHITE, T.
Affiliations
  • Riverview Hospital (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
13
Issue
03
Pages
490-500
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2157269757
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Academy of Neuropsychology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, false-positive diagnosis, base rates, healthy older adults, neuropsychological test battery, memory tests, dementia screening, standardization sample
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk, Statistics as Topic, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review