Cited by 97Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

D-KEFS trail making test performance in patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions

YOCHIM, BRIAN, BALDO, JULIANA, NELSON, ADAM, DELIS, DEAN C.·2007·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

This study evaluated cognitive set-shifting in 12 patients with focal lesions in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPC) by examining their performance on the Trail Making Test from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Patients with LPC lesions performed significantly worse than controls on the D-KEFS Trail Making Test on the Letter Sequencing, Number-Letter Switching (set-shifting), and Motor Speed conditions. Patients with LPC lesions performed significantly more slowly on the Number-Letter Switching condition even after controlling for performance on the four baseline conditions of the test. In addition, patients with LPC lesions exhibited significantly elevated error rates on the Number-Letter Switching condition. Results suggest that LPC lesions can lead to impaired cognitive set-shifting on a visual-motor sequencing task. (JINS, 2007, 13, 704–709.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617707070907

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain regions commonly activated by WCST, ID/ED, and TMT involve fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal areas.

    “As shown in Table 1 (in the main text), regions commonly activated during these tasks are related to fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal brain regions [59–65].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YOCHIM, B., BALDO, J., NELSON, A., & DELIS, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2007-05-18
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
704-709
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W1966774731
Cited by
97
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17778)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Trail Making Test, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System, executive function, motor speed, error rate, brain injury
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Trail Making Test, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review