Cited by 258Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The cerebral correlates of set-shifting: an fMRI study of the trail making test

Open access
Moll, Jorge, Oliveira-Souza, Ricardo de, Moll, Fernanda Tovar, Bramati, Ivanei Edson, Andreiuolo, Pedro Angelo·2002·Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract

The trail making test (TMT) pertains to a family of tests that tap the ability to alternate between cognitive categories. However, the value of the TMT as a localizing instrument remains elusive. Here we report the results of a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of a verbal adaptation of the TMT (vTMT). The vTMT takes advantage of the set-shifting properties of the TMT and, at the same time, minimizes the visuospatial and visuomotor components of the written TMT. Whole brain BOLD fMRI was performed during the alternating execution of vTMTA and vTMTB in seven normal adults with more than 12 years of formal education. Brain activation related to the set-shifting component of vTMTB was investigated by comparing performance on vTMTB with vTMTA, a simple counting task. There was a marked asymmetry of activation in favor of the left hemisphere, most notably in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 6 lateral, 44 and 46) and supplementary motor area/cingulate sulcus (BA 6 medial and 32). The intraparietal sulcus (BA 7 and 39) was bilaterally activated. These findings are in line with clinico-anatomic and functional neuroimaging data that point to a critical role of the dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortices as well as the intraparietal sulci in the regulation of cognitive flexibility, intention, and the covert execution of saccades/anti-saccades. Many commonly used neuropsychological paradigms, such as the Stroop, Wisconsin Card Sorting, and go - no go tasks, share some patterns of cerebral activation with the TMT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0004-282x2002000600002

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain regions commonly activated by WCST, ID/ED, and TMT involve fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal areas.

    “As shown in Table 1 (in the main text), regions commonly activated during these tasks are related to fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal brain regions [59–65].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [61]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Crowe SF. The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on Parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J Clin Psychol 1998;54:585-591.
  2. Moll J, Oliveira-Souza R, Passman LJ, Cunha FC, Lima FS, Andreiuolo PA. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of pantomimes of tool use. Neurology 2000;54:1331-1336.
  3. Fisher CM. Abulia minor vs agitated behavior. Clin Neurosurg 1984;31:9-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moll, J., Oliveira-Souza, R. D., Moll, F. T., Bramati, I. E., & Andreiuolo, P. A.
Affiliations
  • LABS-Rede D'Or, Grupo de Neuroimagem e Neurologia do Comportamento (GNNC)
  • LABS-Rede D'Or, Grupo de Neuroimagem e Neurologia do Comportamento (GNNC); Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle; Instituto Philippe Pihel
Venue
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Published
2002-12
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
900-905
ISSN
0004-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164501949
Cited by
258
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
set-shifting, Trail Making Test, cognitive flexibility, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, intraparietal sulcus, hemispheric lateralization, BOLD fMRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Set, Psychology, Trail Making Test, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review