Cited by 148Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Construct validity of cognitive reserve in a multiethnic cohort: The Northern Manhattan Study

Open access
SIEDLECKI, KAREN L., STERN, YAAKOV, REUBEN, AARON, SACCO, RALPH L., ELKIND, MITCHELL S.V., WRIGHT, CLINTON B.·2009·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Cognitive reserve is a hypothetical construct that has been used to inform models of cognitive aging and is presumed to be indicative of life experiences that may mitigate the effects of brain pathology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of cognitive reserve by examining both its convergent and its discriminant validity across three different samples of participants using structural equation modeling. The cognitive reserve variables were found to correlate highly with one another (thereby providing evidence of convergent validity), but demanding tests of discriminant validity indicated that, in two of the samples, the cognitive reserve construct was highly related to an executive functioning construct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709090857

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Wechsler, 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised
  2. Raven, 1962, Advanced progressive matrices, set II
  3. Matthews, 1964, Instruction manual for the Adult Neuropsychology Test Battery
  4. Dunn, 1997, Examiner’s manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-third edition
  5. Delis, 2000, California Verbal Learning Test-second edition: Adult version. Manual
  6. Arbuckle, 2003, Amos 5.0
  7. D’Elia, 1996, Color Trails Test. Professional manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Metadata

Authors
SIEDLECKI, K. L., STERN, Y., REUBEN, A., SACCO, R. L., ELKIND, M. S. V., & WRIGHT, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
STERN, YAAKOV
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
558-569
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2116306444
Cited by
147
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020004)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS029993, R01-NS 29993, K02NS059729)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive reserve, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, cognitive aging, executive function, multi-ethnic cohort, Northern Manhattan Study, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review