Cited by 55Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

How Inhibition Relates to Impulsivity after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Open access
Rochat, Lucien, Beni, Catia, Annoni, Jean-Marie, Vuadens, Philippe, Van der Linden, Martial·2013·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Impulsive behaviors and poor inhibition performances are frequently described in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, few studies have examined impulsivity and associated inhibition impairments in these patients. Twenty-eight patients with moderate to severe TBI and 27 matched controls performed a stop-signal task designed to assess prepotent response inhibition (the ability to inhibit a dominant or automatic motor response) in a neutral or emotional context and a recent negative task to assess resistance to proactive interference (the ability to resist the intrusion into memory of information that was previously relevant but has since become irrelevant). Informants of each patient completed a short questionnaire designed to assess impulsivity. Patients showed a significant increase in current urgency, lack of premeditation, and lack of perseverance when retrospectively compared with the preinjury condition. Group comparisons revealed poorer prepotent response inhibition and resistance to proactive interference performances in patients with TBI. Finally, correlation analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between urgency (the tendency to act rashly when distressed) and prepotent response inhibition in patients with TBI. This study sheds new light on the construct of impulsivity after a TBI, its related cognitive mechanisms, and its potential role in problematic behaviors described after a TBI. (JINS, 2013,19, 1–9)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617713000672

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Benjamini, Y., &Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57, 289-300
  2. Billieux, J., Gay, P., Rochat, L., &Van der Linden, M. (2010). The role of urgency and its underlying psychological mechanisms in problematic behaviours. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1085-1096 doi:10.1016/j.brat. 2010.07.008 · DOI
  3. Cyders, M.A. (2013). Impulsivity and the sexes: Measurement and structural invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Assessment, 20, 86-97 doi:10.1177/1073191111428762 · DOI
  4. Dimoska-Di Marco, A., McDonald, S., Kelly, M., Tate, R., &Johnstone, S. (2011). A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 471-485 doi:10.1080/13803395. 2010.533158 · DOI
  5. Gay, P., Courvoisier, D.S., Billieux, J., Rochat, L., Schmidt, R.E., &Van der Linden, M. (2010). Can the distinction between intentional and unintentional interference control help differentiate varieties of impulsivity? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 46-52 doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.003 · DOI
  6. Hamilton, A.C., &Martin, R.C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, &Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1-13 doi:10.3758/CABN.5.1.1 (Pubitemid 41431326) · DOI
  7. Levin, H., &Kraus, M.F. (1994). The frontal lobes and traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 443-454 (Pubitemid 24344864)
  8. Logan, G.D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach &T.H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  9. Miller, J., Flory, K., Lynam, D.R., &Leukefeld, C. (2003). A test of the four-factor model of impulsivity-related traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1403-1418 doi:10.1016/S0191- 8869(02)00122-8 (Pubitemid 36535600) · DOI
  10. Nee, D.E., Jonides, J., &Berman, M.G. (2007). Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution. Neuroimage, 38, 740-751 doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2007.07.066 (Pubitemid 47633984) · DOI
  11. Ponsford, J., Sloan, S., &Snow, P. (2013). Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living (2nd ed.). Hove, England: Psychology Press
  12. Rochat, L., Beni, C., Billieux, J., Azouvi, P., Annoni, J.M., &Van der Linden, M. (2010). Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20, 778-797 doi:10.1080/09602011.2010.495245 · DOI
  13. Rochat, L., Billieux, J., Juillerat Van der Linden, A.C., Annoni, J.M., Zekry, D., Gold, G., &Van der Linden, M. (2013). A multidimensional approach to impulsivity changes in mild Alzheimers disease and control participants: Cognitive correlates. Cortex, 49, 90-100 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.004 · DOI
  14. Rochat, L., Delbeuck, X., Billieux, J., dAcremont, M., Juillerat Van der Linden, A.C., &Van der Linden, M. (2008). Assessing impulsivity changes in Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Disease &Associated Disorders, 22, 278-283 doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e318166d692 · DOI
  15. Tate, R.L. (1999). Executive dysfunction and characterological changes after traumatic brain injury: Two sides of the same coin? Cortex, 35, 39-55 doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70784-6 (Pubitemid 29123820) · DOI
  16. Whiteside, S.P., &Lynam, D.R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669-689 doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00) 00064-7 (Pubitemid 33380663) · DOI
  17. Wickens, D.D., Born, D.G., &Allen, C.K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440-445 doi:10.1016/ S0022-5371(63)80045-6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rochat, L., Beni, C., Annoni, J.-M., Vuadens, P., & Van der Linden, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Clinique Romande de Réadaptation (CH)
Corresponding author
Rochat, Lucien
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2013-07-02
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
890-898
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2145415809
Cited by
55
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, impulsivity, response inhibition, prepotent response inhibition, proactive interference, urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance, emotional context, stop-signal task, problematic behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Statistics as Topic, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review