Cited by 437Cognitive Abilities and TestingHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

Open access
Heaton, Robert K., Akshoomoff, Natacha, Tulsky, David, Mungas, Dan, Weintraub, Sandra, Dikmen, Sureyya, Beaumont, Jennifer, Casaletto, Kaitlin B. +3 more·2014·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

This study describes psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) Composite Scores in an adult sample. The NIHTB-CB was designed for use in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for ages 3 to 85. A total of 268 self-described healthy adults were recruited at four university-based sites, using stratified sampling guidelines to target demographic variability for age (20–85 years), gender, education, and ethnicity. The NIHTB-CB contains seven computer-based instruments assessing five cognitive sub-domains: Language, Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Processing Speed, and Working Memory. Participants completed the NIHTB-CB, corresponding gold standard validation measures selected to tap the same cognitive abilities, and sociodemographic questionnaires. Three Composite Scores were derived for both the NIHTB-CB and gold standard batteries: “Crystallized Cognition Composite,” “Fluid Cognition Composite,” and “Total Cognition Composite” scores. NIHTB Composite Scores showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas=0.84 Crystallized, 0.83 Fluid, 0.77 Total), excellent test–retest reliability (r: 0.86–0.92), strong convergent (r: 0.78–0.90) and discriminant (r: 0.19–0.39) validities versus gold standard composites, and expected age effects ( r =0.18 crystallized, r =−0.68 fluid, r =−0.26 total). Significant relationships with self-reported prior school difficulties and current health status, employment, and presence of a disability provided evidence of external validity. The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Composite Scores have excellent reliability and validity, suggesting they can be used effectively in epidemiologic and clinical studies. ( JINS , 2014, 20 , 1–11)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617714000241

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This improvement is greater than the small-to-medium practice effect reported in the normative sample for this battery.

    “this improvement is greater than the small-to-medium practice effect reported in the normative sample for this battery [44]”

    From A phase I trial of accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS for amnestic MCI (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results section (Test–Retest Reliability and Practice Effects; page not provided) reports a small-to-medium practice effect for the Fluid Cognition composite (d = 0.42). But that estimate came from 89 retested participants described as a convenience sample, not a normative sample; the Discussion says national norming was still under way. The cited paper also cannot establish whether the citing study’s improvement was greater without that improvement’s magnitude. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Byrd DA Miller SW Reilly J Weber S Wall TL Heaton RK Early environmental factors, ethnicity, and adult cognitive test performance The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006 20 243 260 16690545
  2. Cattell RB Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action 1971 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  3. Cohen J A power primer Psychological Bulletin 1992 112 155 159 19565683
  4. Cysique L Franklin D Abramson I Ellis R Letendre S Collier A Heaton RK Normative data and validation of a regression based summary score for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011 33 5 505 522 21391011 PMC3151558
  5. Dunn LM Dunn LM Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Fourth Edition (PPVT-4) 2007 Circle Pines, MN American Guidance Services
  6. Heaton RK Ryan L Grant I Grant I Adams KM Demographic influences and use of demographically corrected norms in neuropsychological assessment Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders 2009 New York Oxford University Press 127 155
  7. Heaton RK Taylor MJ Manly J Tulsky DS Saklofske DH Chelune GJ Heaton RK Ivnik RJ Bornstein R Prifitera A Ledbetter MF Demographic effects and use of demographically corrected norms with the WAIS-III and WMS III Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III 2003 San Diego, CA Academic Press 181 210
  8. Horn JL Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence Psychological Review 1968 75 242 259 4875815
  9. Horn JL Cattell RB Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence Acta Psychologica 1967 26 107 129 6037305
  10. Li S-C Lindenberger U Hommel B Aschersleben G Prinz W Baltes P Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span Psychological Science 2004 15 155 163 15016286
  11. Mungas D Heaton RK Tulsky D Zelazo PD Slotkin J Blitz D Gershon R Factor structure, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in Adults Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (submitted). PMC4103956 24960474
  12. Mungas D Widaman K Zelazo PD Tulsky D Heaton R Slotkin J Gershon R Zelazo PD Bauer PJ NIH Toolbox Cognitive Function Battery (CFB): Factor structure for 3- to 15- year-olds National Institutes of Health Toolbox-Cognitive Function Battery (NIH Toolbox CFB):validation for children between 3 and 15 years. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development Monographs 2013 78 4 103 118 PMC3950958 23952205
  13. Norman MA Moore DJ Taylor M Franklin D Cysique L Ake C Heaton RK Demographically corrected norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test- Revised, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Version Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011 33 7 793 804 21547817 PMC3154384
  14. Wechsler D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) 2008 San Antonio, TX The Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heaton, R. K., Akshoomoff, N., Tulsky, D., Mungas, D., Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S., Beaumont, J., Casaletto, K. B., Conway, K., Slotkin, J., & Gershon, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Kessler Foundation (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Heaton, Robert K.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2014-06-24
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
588-598
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2128607849
Cited by
437
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kessler Foundation
  • California Department of Public Health
  • Brown University
  • Ohio State University
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Washington
  • Temple University
  • Davee Foundation
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • National Institutes of Health (HHS-N-260–2006-00007-C)
  • University of California, San Diego (P30MH062512)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133B090024, H133G070138, H133N060022)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129, N01-AG-6-0007, R01AG010220, RC2AG036498, P30AG013854, AG-260-06-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI K23, K23HL085766 NIA, K23HL085766)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH083506, R01MH058076, R01MH081861, R01MH083552, R01MH078737, R01MH078748, R01MH073433, R01MH060720, P30MH062512)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA026306, F31DA035708, P01DA012065, T32DA031098)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC008552)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK082342)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS058302, U01 NS 056 975 02, H133B090024)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U54AR057943, U01AR057929)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061400)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, composite score, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, fluid cognition, cognitive aging, executive function, episodic memory, processing speed, working memory, language, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, generalizability, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Executive Function, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review