Cited by 29Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Cognitive Indicators of Preclinical Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia in MAPT Carriers

Open access
Cheran, Gayathri, Wu, Liwen, Lee, Seonjoo, Manoochehri, Masood, Cines, Sarah, Fallon, Emer, Lynch, Timothy, Heidebrink, Judith +4 more·2019·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The cognitive indicators of preclinical behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD) have not been identified. To investigate these indicators, we compared cross-sectional performance on a range of cognitive measures in 12 carriers of pathogenic MAPT mutations not meeting diagnostic criteria for bvFTD (i.e., preclinical) versus 32 demographically-matched familial non-carriers (n = 44). Studying preclinical carriers offers a rare glimpse into emergent disease, environmentally and genetically contextualized through comparison to familial controls. METHODS: Evaluating personnel blinded to carrier status administered a standardized neuropsychological battery assessing attention, speed, executive function, language, memory, spatial ability, and social cognition. Results from mixed effect modeling were corrected for multiplicity of comparison by the false discovery rate method, and results were considered significant at p < .05. To control for potential interfamilial variation arising from enrollment of six families, family was treated as a random effect, while carrier status, age, gender, and education were treated as fixed effects. RESULTS: Group differences were detected in 17 of 31 cognitive scores and spanned all domains except spatial ability. As hypothesized, carriers performed worse on specific measures of executive function, and social cognition, but also on measures of attention, speed, semantic processing, and memory storage and retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Most notably, group differences arose on measures of memory storage, challenging long-standing ideas about the absence of amnestic features on neuropsychological testing in early bvFTD. Current findings provide important and clinically relevant information about specific measures that may be sensitive to early bvFTD, and advance understanding of neurocognitive changes that occur early in the disease. (JINS, 2019, 25, 184-194).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617718001005

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van Swieten J, Stevens M, Rosso S, Rizzu P, Joosse M, De Koning I,... Niermeijer M. (1999). Phenotypic variation in hereditary frontotemporal dementia with tau mutations. Annals of neurology, 46(4), 617– 626. 10514099

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheran, G., Wu, L., Lee, S., Manoochehri, M., Cines, S., Fallon, E., Lynch, T., Heidebrink, J., Paulson, H., Goldman, J., Huey, E., & Cosentino, S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cosentino, Stephanie
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2018-11-21
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
184-194
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2901056969
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000040)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG053760, U01AG016976, K01AG051348)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS076837, U24NS095871)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, tauopathy, cognitive indicators, executive function, social cognition, memory impairment, attention and processing speed, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Cohort Studies, tau Proteins, Executive Function, Frontotemporal Dementia, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review