The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring sustainable development: progress on indicators
Abstract
The search for sustainability indicators should be guided by a theory of sustainable development (SD). In this paper we investigate two such theoretical frameworks and the indicators that they suggest. Indicators associated with weak sustainability are characterized by aggregative indicators such as green national income. We conclude, however, that a more promising offshoot of green accounting is measures of genuine savings (i.e. savings adjusted for loss of assets). To achieve SD, genuine savings rates must not be persistently negative. Strong sustainability indicators accord a more central role to the conservation of critical natural assets within the broader goal of prudently managing a nation's portfolio of assets over time. We discuss two approaches—carrying capacity and resilience—and conclude that, while measures of resilience are potentially attractive, more research is required regarding the resilience–SD link. However, an important conclusion that we can make is that, even in an economy operating under a strong sustainability regime, genuine savings are still key indicators of SD and are complementary to measures of changes in stocks of critical natural assets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., et al. (2004) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330042162377 · Cited by 853
Net national product, wealth, and social well-being
DASGUPTA, P., & MÄLER, K.-G. (2000) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x00000061 · Cited by 533
Reverse logistics and social sustainability
Sarkis, J., Helms, M. M., & Hervani, A. A. (2010) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.220 · Cited by 476
“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework
Munda, G. (2005) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0 · Cited by 358
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Munda, G. (2006) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearce, D., Hamilton, K., & Atkinson, G.
- Venue
- Environment and Development Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-101
- ISSN
- 1355-770X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4395
- OpenAlex
- W2089750070
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring sustainable development: progress on indicators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355770x00000395
- The paper
- Pearce, D., Hamilton, K., & Atkinson, G. (1996). Measuring sustainable development: progress on indicators. Environment and Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x00000395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.