Cited by 71Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Healthcare Practice, Epistemic Injustice, and Naturalism

Open access
Kidd, Ian James, Carel, Havi·2018·Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement

Abstract

Ill persons suffer from a variety of epistemically-inflected harms and wrongs. Many of these are interpretable as specific forms of what we dub pathocentric epistemic injustices , these being ones that target and track ill persons. We sketch the general forms of pathocentric testimonial and hermeneutical injustice, each of which are pervasive within the experiences of ill persons during their encounters in healthcare contexts and the social world. What's epistemically unjust might not be only agents, communities and institutions, but the theoretical conceptions of health that structure our responses to illness. Thus, we suggest that although such pathocentric epistemic injustices have a variety of interpersonal and structural causes, they are also sustained by a deeper naturalistic conception of the nature of illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1358246118000620

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This credibility deficit can be broadly characterized as pathocentric testimonial injustice that operates broadly and pervasively, in tandem with relevant tracker prejudices.

    “This can be broadly characterized as pathocentric testimonial injustice (Kidd & Carel, 2018) that operates broadly and pervasively, in tandem with the relevant tracker prejudices.”

    From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Kidd & Carel, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kidd, Ian James
  • Carel, Havi
Venue
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
Published
2018-11
Volume
84
Pages
211-233
ISSN
  • 1358-2461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-3555
OpenAlex
W2898709285
Cited by
71
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (publishedVersion)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, healthcare encounters, illness, naturalism, concept of health, illness experience, structural injustice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review