Healthcare Practice, Epistemic Injustice, and Naturalism
Open accessAbstract
Ill persons suffer from a variety of epistemically-inflected harms and wrongs. Many of these are interpretable as specific forms of what we dub pathocentric epistemic injustices , these being ones that target and track ill persons. We sketch the general forms of pathocentric testimonial and hermeneutical injustice, each of which are pervasive within the experiences of ill persons during their encounters in healthcare contexts and the social world. What's epistemically unjust might not be only agents, communities and institutions, but the theoretical conceptions of health that structure our responses to illness. Thus, we suggest that although such pathocentric epistemic injustices have a variety of interpersonal and structural causes, they are also sustained by a deeper naturalistic conception of the nature of illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This credibility deficit can be broadly characterized as pathocentric testimonial injustice that operates broadly and pervasively, in tandem with relevant tracker prejudices.
“This can be broadly characterized as pathocentric testimonial injustice (Kidd & Carel, 2018) that operates broadly and pervasively, in tandem with the relevant tracker prejudices.”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Kidd & Carel, 2018
Cites
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203720714 · Cited by 4,869 · see citing works
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Dotson, K. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice 1
Medina, J. (2017) · The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice · doi:10.4324/9781315212043-4 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Scully, J. L. (2018) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab.11.1.106 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kidd, Ian James
- Carel, Havi
- Venue
- Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 84
- Pages
- 211-233
- ISSN
- 1358-2461 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-3555
- OpenAlex
- W2898709285
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- library.oapen.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (publishedVersion)
- OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, healthcare encounters, illness, naturalism, concept of health, illness experience, structural injustice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review