The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important?
Open accessAbstract
In this study we examined the level of English proficiency children can obtain through out-of-school exposure in informal contexts prior to English classroom instruction. The second aim was to determine the input types that fuel children's informal language acquisition. Language learning was investigated in 780 Dutch-speaking children (aged 10–12), who were tested on their English receptive vocabulary knowledge, listening, speaking, reading and writing skills. Information about learner characteristics and out-of-school English exposure was gathered using questionnaires. The results show large language gains for a substantial number of children but also considerable individual differences. The most beneficial types of input were gaming, use of social media and speaking. These input types are interactive and multimodal and they involve language production. We also found that the various language tests largely measure the same proficiency component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment
Verhelst, N. D., Avermaet, P. V., Takala, S., Figueras, N., & North, B. (2009) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 6,085
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Campbell, J. M., & Dommestrup, A. K. (2010) · The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0649 · Cited by 3,787
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
(2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45 · Cited by 2,230
McDonough, K. (2008) · Language and Education · doi:10.2167/le128.0 · Cited by 1,267
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747758 · Cited by 1,249
Informal and Incidental Learning
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.5 · Cited by 1,194
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066
Multiple voices : an introduction to bilingualism
Myers‐Scotton, C. (2006) · Cited by 913
Bridging In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Education
Eshach, H. (2007) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1 · Cited by 868
Metadata
- Authors
- De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J.
- Venue
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-02-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-185
- ISSN
- 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2916385107
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 116.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1366728918001062
- The paper
- De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020). Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918001062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.