The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores
Abstract
Abstract The current extinction crisis is caused primarily by human impacts upon wild populations. Large carnivores are especially sensitive to human activity; because their requirements often conflict with those of local people, predators have been actively persecuted in most regions of the world. In this paper, the impact of people upon predators is analysed by relating local carnivore extinctions to past and projected human population densities. There are strong associations between high human density and the loss of carnivore populations from a region. Interspecific variation in ability to survive at high human densities probably reflects species' ability to adapt to human‐modified habitats. However, regional and temporal variation in individual species' sensitivity to human density is more likely to reflect the activities of local people than the phenotypes of local carnivores. Local culture, government policy and international trade all influence human attitudes to predators and, therefore, the impact of people upon carnivore populations. The importance of these factors may mean that extinction risks for carnivores will continue to increase, even though human population growth is projected to deccelerate during the new millennium. This points to an urgent need for techniques to resolve conflicts between people and predators at either the local or landscape level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare
Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., & Boucher, T. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140170 · Cited by 945
Big City Life: Carnivores in Urban Environments
Bateman, P. W., & Fleming, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x · Cited by 832
Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores
Cardillo, M., Purvis, A., Sechrest, W., Gittleman, J. L., Bielby, J., & Mace, G. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197 · Cited by 618
The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: A review and analysis
Jule, K. R., Leaver, L. A., & Lea, S. E. G. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.007 · Cited by 384
Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range
Jacobson, A. P., Gerngross, P., Lemeris Jr., J. R., Schoonover, R. F., Anco, C., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Durant, S. M., Farhadinia, M. S., Henschel, P., Kamler, J. F., et al. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1974 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodroffe, R.
- Venue
- Animal Conservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-173
- ISSN
- 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038935866
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s136794300000086x
- The paper
- Woodroffe, R. (2000). Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s136794300000086x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.