The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of human population size in raising bird and mammal threat among nations
Abstract
It is commonly held that species loss is linked to human population size but there are surprisingly few quantitative studies that measure the strength and nature of this linkage. In a study of about 150 nations, a highly significant positive relationship (P << 0.01) was found between population size and threat levels of birds and mammals. For continental nations, log population explains 16‐33% of the variation in threat level among nations. The pattern of the continental population‐threat correlation indicates that per capita human impacts are initially very high and asymptotically diminish with increasing population size. No population‐threat correlation was found for island nations, since human impacts are apparently so catastrophic that human population size is largely irrelevant. Surprisingly, for both islands and continents, area does not affect the level of threat after human population size is accounted for. Thus, even on continents the harmful impacts of humans, for a given population size, are evidently so profound that no amount of added area provides compensatory refugia for native species. Major regional differences in levels of threat are shown, with nations in Asia and the Middle East having generally higher proportions of threatened species than nations in Africa. The causes of these differences are only partly related to population size. Other factors not related to population size are that Asian nations tend to have much higher rates of mammal over‐harvesting and Middle Eastern nations tend to have statistically lower percentages of area set aside as preserves. Threat proportions are correlated between birds and mammals among nations implying that one group may be a proxy indicator of impacts on the other. The slope of this relationship indicates that mammals suffer more losses during initial human impacts but proportions of threatened birds increase more rapidly than mammals as human impacts become more widespread.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
Cited by
Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order
Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A., Epstein, P. R., Ewel, J. J., Klink, C. A., Lugo, A. E., et al. (2006) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00212.x · Cited by 2,093
The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments
Bulleri, F., & Chapman, M. G. (2010) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x · Cited by 1,043
Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores
Cardillo, M., Purvis, A., Sechrest, W., Gittleman, J. L., Bielby, J., & Mace, G. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197 · Cited by 618
Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography
Olden, J. D. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x · Cited by 572
RAHEL, F. J. (2007) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01708.x · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- McKinney, M. L.
- Venue
- Animal Conservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-57
- ISSN
- 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1795
- OpenAlex
- W2151688413
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of human population size in raising bird and mammal threat among nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1367943001001056
- The paper
- McKinney, M. L. (2001). Role of human population size in raising bird and mammal threat among nations. Animal Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1367943001001056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.