Cited by 89Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesBehavioral Health and Interventions

A systematic review of interventions aimed at the prevention of weight gain in adults

Open access
Lombard, Catherine B, Deeks, Amanda A, Teede, Helena J·2009·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: The WHO has recommended that prevention of overweight and obesity should begin early and target adults, including those with an acceptable BMI. The aim of the present paper was to systematically review published interventions with a specific stated aim to prevent weight gain. Design: Five databases were searched to July 2008. The reference lists of review articles and obesity society meetings abstracts were hand searched. Interventions were included if the primary aim was to prevent weight gain and they included a comparison group. Results: Ten publications were included, describing nine separate interventions in adults of various ages and target populations. All interventions incorporated diet and physical activity with behaviour change strategies. Most studies were between 1 and 3 years in duration. Five studies reported a significant difference in weight between intervention and control subjects of between 1·0 and 3·5 kg, due largely to an increase in weight in the control group. However, there was a lack of consistent, clear, psychological models and a failure to identify successful components. More intensive interventions were not always successful, nor were mail-only or clinic-based interventions. In contrast, interventions that included mixed modes of delivery with some personal contact were successful. Conclusions: There were relatively few trials aimed at the prevention of weight gain. Existing trials varied by intensity, delivery methods, target groups and study components, and therefore provide limited opportunities for comparison of effect size. Further large, effective, evidence-based programmes are urgently needed in the general population as well as high-risk groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980009990577

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lemmens VE, Oenema A, Klepp KI, Henriksen HB & Brug J (2008) A systematic review of the evidence regarding efficacy of obesity prevention interventions among adults. Obes Rev 9, 446-455.
  2. Brown T, Avenell A, Edmunds L, Moore H, Whitaker V, Avery L & Summerbell C (2008) Systematic review of long term lifestyle intervention to prevent obesity in adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, Suppl. 1, S33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lombard, C. B., Deeks, A. A., & Teede, H. J.
Affiliations
Jean Hailes (AU)
Corresponding author
Lombard, Catherine B
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2009-08-04
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2236-2246
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2155712935
Cited by
89
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
weight gain prevention, obesity prevention, overweight prevention, adults, behavior change strategies, intervention delivery mode, intervention intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Weight Gain, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review