Cited by 62Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to prevent weight gain over the Christmas holiday period: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Mason, Frances, Farley, Amanda, Pallan, Miranda, Sitch, Alice, Easter, Christina, Daley, Amanda J·2018·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to prevent weight gain over the Christmas holiday period. Design: Two group, double blinded randomised controlled trial. Setting: Recruitment from workplaces, social media platforms, and schools pre-Christmas 2016 and 2017 in Birmingham, UK. Participants: 272 adults aged 18 years or more with a body mass index of 20 or more: 136 were randomised to a brief behavioural intervention and 136 to a leaflet on healthy living (comparator). Baseline assessments were conducted in November and December with follow-up assessments in January and February (4-8 weeks after baseline). Interventions: The intervention aimed to increase restraint of eating and drinking through regular self weighing and recording of weight and reflection on weight trajectory; providing information on good weight management strategies over the Christmas period; and pictorial information on the physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) of regularly consumed festive foods and drinks. The goal was to gain no more than 0.5 kg of baseline weight. The comparator group received a leaflet on healthy living. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was weight at follow-up. The primary analysis compared weight at follow-up between the intervention and comparator arms, adjusting for baseline weight and the stratification variable of attendance at a commercial weight loss programme. Secondary outcomes (recorded at follow-up) were: weight gain of 0.5 kg or less, self reported frequency of self weighing (at least twice weekly versus less than twice weekly), percentage body fat, and cognitive restraint of eating, emotional eating, and uncontrolled eating. Results: Mean weight change was −0.13 kg (95% confidence interval −0.4 to 0.15) in the intervention group and 0.37 kg (0.12 to 0.62) in the comparator group. The adjusted mean difference in weight (intervention−comparator) was −0.49 kg (95% confidence interval −0.85 to −0.13, P=0.008). The odds ratio for gaining no more than 0.5 kg was non-significant (1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.00, P=0.44). Conclusion: A brief behavioural intervention involving regular self weighing, weight management advice, and information about the amount of physical activity required to expend the calories in festive foods and drinks prevented weight gain over the Christmas holiday period. Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15071781 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.k4867

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]BD Association. Food Fact Sheet: Christmas. 2014. BDA November 2014. Review date November 2017. Version 4. www.bda.uk.com/foodfacts/christmas.pdf
  2. [18]Andrews BR Habit. Am J Psychol 1903; 14: 121- 49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, F., Farley, A., Pallan, M., Sitch, A., Easter, C., & Daley, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Farley, Amanda
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-12-10
Volume
363
Pages
k4867
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2904135982
Cited by
62
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
holiday weight gain, Christmas, weight management, self-monitoring, self-weighing, dietary restraint, emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, festive food, slimming program, overweight adults, body fat percentage, weight gain prevention, public health communication, social media recruitment, school recruitment, intervention effectiveness, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Holidays, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Brief, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review