Cited by 50Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth Education and ValidationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy instrument in general population and highly educated samples of Brazilian adults

Open access
Rodrigues, Renne, de Andrade, Selma Maffei, González, Alberto Durán, Birolim, Marcela Maria, Mesas, Arthur Eumann·2017·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: The present work aimed at cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the health literacy assessment tool Newest Vital Sign (NVS) in general population (GP) and highly educated (HE) samples of Brazilian adults. Design: An expert committee reviewed the translation and back-translation processes and the cultural adaptation. The construct validity was analysed with confirmatory factor analysis and via associations with features of the study population. Setting: The final validation test was performed in two different populations from Londrina, a large town in southern Brazil. Subjects: Brazilian adults: GP (adult clients of community pharmacies;n 189) and HE (public school teachers;n 301). Results: The tool under validation showed good cross-cultural adaptation and internal consistency, with Cronbach’s α of 0·75 for GP and 0·74 for HE. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable models and identified two independent factors according to the relationship between components and numeracy for both GP and HE data. According to the Brazilian Portuguese version of the NVS instrument (NVS-BR), 48·7 % of GP and 33·5 % of HE presented adequate health literacy; this condition was inversely associated with age for both populations and directly correlated with educational level for GP. Conclusions: The NVS-BR showed good validity in two different populations of Brazilian adults and can be considered an alternative in screening for inadequate health literacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980017000787

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, R., de Andrade, S. M., González, A. D., Birolim, M. M., & Mesas, A. E.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
Corresponding author
Rodrigues, Renne
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2017-05-18
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1907-1913
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2614111210
Cited by
50
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundacion Araucaria
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Ministério da Educação
  • Universidade Norte do Paraná
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
Newest Vital Sign, health literacy, cross-cultural adaptation, Brazilian Portuguese translation, health literacy screening, numeracy, public school teachers, educational attainment, age, Brazilian adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review