Cited by 30Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsHearing Impairment and CommunicationFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

Communication barrier in family linked to increased risks for food insecurity among deaf people who use American Sign Language

Open access
Kushalnagar, Poorna, Moreland, Christopher J, Simons, Abbi, Holcomb, Tara·2018·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: Food security is defined as being able to access enough food that will help maintain an active, healthy lifestyle for those living in a household. While there are no studies on food security issues among deaf people, research shows that communication barriers early in life are linked to poor physical and mental health outcomes. Childhood communication barriers may also risk later food insecurity. Design/Setting/Subjects: A single food security screener question found to have 82 % sensitivity in classifying families who are at risk for food insecurity was taken from the six-item US Household Food Security Survey Module. Questions related to food insecurity screener, depression diagnosis and retrospective communication experience were translated to American Sign Language and then included in an online survey. Over 600 deaf adult signers (18–95 years old) were recruited across the USA. Results: After adjusting for covariates, deaf adults who reported being able to understand little to none of what their caregiver said during their formative years were about five times more likely to often experience difficulty with making food last or finding money to buy more food, and were about three times more likely to sometimes experience this difficulty, compared with deaf adults who reported to being able to understand some to all of what their caregiver said. Conclusions: Our results have highlighted a marked risk for food insecurity and related outcomes among deaf people. This should raise serious concern among individuals who have the potential to effect change in deaf children’s access to communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980017002865

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linguistic deprivation also leads to other health and psycho-social problems.

    “as well as other health [11] and psycho-social problems [12][13][14][15][16].”

    From Support for parents of deaf children: Common questions and informed, evidence-based answers (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion links limited access to caregiver communication with food insecurity and describes related findings on mental health, academic development and quality of life. But this study reports an association among deaf adults, not evidence that linguistic deprivation causes health and psycho-social problems generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kushalnagar, P., Moreland, C. J., Simons, A., & Holcomb, T.
Affiliations
  • Gallaudet University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kushalnagar, Poorna
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
912-916
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2790696073
Cited by
30
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC014463, R15DC014816)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
food insecurity, deaf people, American Sign Language, communication barriers, caregiver communication, deaf adults, depression, Household Food Security Survey Module, food insecurity screening, sign language translation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Communication, Communication Barriers, Deafness, Family, Family Characteristics, Female, Food Supply, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sign Language, Caregivers, Children with Disabilities, Comprehension, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review