Cited by 5,505Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review

Berkman, Nancy D., Sheridan, Stacey L., Donahue, Katrina E., Halpern, David J., Crotty, Karen·2011·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 80 million Americans have limited health literacy, which puts them at greater risk for poorer access to care and poorer health outcomes. PURPOSE: To update a 2004 systematic review and determine whether low health literacy is related to poorer use of health care, outcomes, costs, and disparities in health outcomes among persons of all ages. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles identified through MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Cochrane Library databases and hand-searching (search dates for articles on health literacy, 2003 to 22 February 2011; for articles on numeracy, 1966 to 22 February 2011). STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently selected studies that compared outcomes by differences in directly measured health literacy or numeracy levels. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer abstracted article information into evidence tables; a second reviewer checked information for accuracy. Two reviewers independently rated study quality by using predefined criteria, and the investigative team jointly graded the overall strength of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: 96 relevant good- or fair-quality studies in 111 articles were identified: 98 articles on health literacy, 22 on numeracy, and 9 on both. Low health literacy was consistently associated with more hospitalizations; greater use of emergency care; lower receipt of mammography screening and influenza vaccine; poorer ability to demonstrate taking medications appropriately; poorer ability to interpret labels and health messages; and, among elderly persons, poorer overall health status and higher mortality rates. Poor health literacy partially explains racial disparities in some outcomes. Reviewers could not reach firm conclusions about the relationship between numeracy and health outcomes because of few studies or inconsistent results among studies. LIMITATIONS: Searches were limited to articles published in English. No Medical Subject Heading terms exist for identifying relevant studies. No evidence concerning oral health literacy (speaking and listening skills) and outcomes was found. CONCLUSION: Low health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes and poorer use of health care services. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2011-07-19
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
97-107
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2045241688
Cited by
5,505
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 591 · 2025: 572 · 2024: 523 · 2023: 488 · 2022: 488 · 2021: 494 · 2020: 434 · 2019: 383 · 2018: 344 · 2017: 243 · 2016: 261 · 2015: 259 · 2014: 181 · 2013: 151 · 2012: 76
FWCI
22.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (HHSA-290-2007-10056-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
health literacy, numeracy, health outcomes, health care utilization, racial disparities, hospitalization, emergency department utilization, mammography screening, influenza vaccination, medication adherence, health disparities, older adults, mortality
MeSH terms
Educational Status, Health Services, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitalization, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, United States, Health Care Costs, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Healthcare Disparities, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review