The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Product reformulation and nutritional improvements after new competitive food standards in schools
Abstract
Objective: In 2012, Massachusetts enacted school competitive food and beverage standards similar to national Smart Snacks. These standards aim to improve the nutritional quality of competitive snacks. It was previously demonstrated that a majority of foods and beverages were compliant with the standards, but it was unknown whether food manufacturers reformulated products in response to the standards. The present study assessed whether products were reformulated after standards were implemented; the availability of reformulated products outside schools; and whether compliance with the standards improved the nutrient composition of competitive snacks. Design: An observational cohort study documenting all competitive snacks sold before (2012) and after (2013 and 2014) the standards were implemented. Setting: The sample included thirty-six school districts with both a middle and high school. Results: After 2012, energy, saturated fat, Na and sugar decreased and fibre increased among all competitive foods. By 2013, 8 % of foods were reformulated, as were an additional 9 % by 2014. Nearly 15 % of reformulated foods were look-alike products that could not be purchased at supermarkets. Energy and Na in beverages decreased after 2012, in part facilitated by smaller package sizes. Conclusions: Massachusetts’ law was effective in improving the nutritional content of snacks and product reformulation helped schools adhere to the law. This suggests fully implementing Smart Snacks standards may similarly improve the foods available in schools nationally. However, only some healthier reformulated foods were available outside schools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As noted, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act prompted reformulation of school food products to meet the US Department of Agriculture’s nutrition standards, including the incorporation of whole grain–rich and lower sodium products (22).”
From Food Service Directors’ Knowledge and Beliefs About Ultraprocessed Foods in California’s San Joaquin Valley Schools (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“These foods also enable manufacturers to build brand loyalty among millions of children (25) and may encourage consumption of less healthy versions of reformulated products available outside of school (22).”
From Food Service Directors’ Knowledge and Beliefs About Ultraprocessed Foods in California’s San Joaquin Valley Schools (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruemmer, B., Krieger, J., Saelens, B. E., & Chan, N. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.019 · Cited by 135
Namba, A., Auchincloss, A., Leonberg, B. L., & Wootan, M. G. (2013) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd10.120224 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.5888/pcd10.120198 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00545.x · DOI
- 10.1038/ejcn.2015.201 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.837 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jand.2015.04.019 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2011-3353 · DOI
- 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0745 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.063 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMc1001841 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303139 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.031 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1368980016002044 · DOI
- 10.1089/chi.2016.0080 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.034 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1368980014001724 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4521 · DOI
- Taber, 2012, Differences in nutrient intake associated with state laws regarding fat, sugar, and caloric content of competitive foods, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 166, 452, 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1839 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4457 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gupta, A., Duran Gomez, A. Z., Matheson, D., Sharma, A., Richard, V., Ritchie, L. D., de la Rosa, A., Delgado, D., Islas, G., Hecht, C. A., et al. (2026) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd23.250379
Metadata
- Authors
- Jahn, J. L., Cohen, J. F., Gorski-Findling, M. T., Hoffman, J. A., Rosenfeld, L., Chaffee, R., Smith, L., & Rimm, E. B.
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1011-1018
- ISSN
- 1368-9800
- 1475-2727
- PMC
- PMC6552662
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review