Cited by 76Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingMedia Influence and HealthCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Confusion and nutritional backlash from news media exposure to contradictory information about carbohydrates and dietary fats

Open access
Clark, Danielle, Nagler, Rebekah H, Niederdeppe, Jeff·2019·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of news media exposure to contradictory information about carbohydrates and dietary fats on levels of confusion, nutritional backlash and dietary intentions. DESIGN: We conducted an online survey experiment between 11 and 28 February 2018, randomizing participants to one of six experimental conditions. Two 'contradictory information' conditions asked participants to read one news article on the risks of a low-carbohydrate diet and one article on the risks of a low-fat diet. Two 'convergent information' conditions asked participants to read two articles with similar information on the risks of one of these two diets. A fifth 'established health recommendations' control condition asked participants to read two articles on the harms of smoking and sun exposure. A sixth 'no information' condition served as a second control group. We used general linear models to test hypotheses on the effects of exposure on confusion, nutritional backlash and dietary intentions. SETTING: USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n 901) registered with Amazon's Mechanical Turk (M-Turk). RESULTS: Exposure to contradictory information about carbohydrates and dietary fats increased confusion and nutritional backlash compared with exposure to established health recommendations for non-dietary behaviours and a no-exposure control. Exposure to contradictory information also increased confusion compared with exposure to consistent nutrition information regarding carbohydrates and dietary fats. CONCLUSIONS: Contradictory nutrition information in the news media can negatively affect consumers' attitudes, beliefs and behavioural intentions. Dietary debates that play out in the media may adversely influence both short-term dietary decisions and future efforts to communicate about unrelated nutrition issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980019002866

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, D., Nagler, R. H., & Niederdeppe, J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Niederdeppe, Jeff
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
22
Issue
18
Pages
3336-3348
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2979453501
Cited by
76
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
news exposure, eating intentions, low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, health communication, nutrition misinformation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Confusion, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mass Media, Middle Aged, Motivation, Young Adult, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review