Characteristics of successful primary school-based experiential nutrition programmes: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Diet and nutrition in childhood has been associated with the risk of chronic disease later in life. The aim of this review was to identify key characteristics of successful experiential nutrition interventions aimed to change nutrition-related cognitive and behavioural outcomes in primary schoolchildren. Design: A systematic literature review was undertaken using search terms (‘food security’, ‘school’, ‘nutrition’ and ‘program’) applied to five scientific databases (CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline and Academic Search complete), with outcomes defined as nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes and/or dietary behaviours. Participants: Primary school-aged children exposed to interventions conducted, at least partially, on school grounds. Results: A total of 3800 articles were identified from the initial search and manual searching, of which sixty-seven articles were eligible for inclusion. Forty-two articles met the criteria of being successful, defined as achieving significant differences in outcomes of interest, accompanied by a demonstrated reach. Interventions included school gardens (n 9), food provision (n 5), taste testing (n 8), cooking classes (n 10) and multicomponent programmes (n 10). Nutrition education (when combined with taste testing), cooking-related activities and gardening interventions increased children’s willingness to taste unfamiliar foods including new fruits and vegetables, improved their cooking and food preparation skills and increased nutritional knowledge. Conclusions: This review provides evidence that nutrition education programmes in primary schoolchildren that are experiential in nature are most likely to be successful if they include multiple strategies, have parental involvement and focus specifically on vegetable intake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that multi-component interventions are promising is consistent with recent empirical evidence.
“This finding is consistent with recent empirical evidence [46–49], highlighting the potential of such interventions to address the complex factors influencing adolescents’ eating behaviour.”
From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Such approaches have also been linked to gains in nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, food preferences, and dietary behaviors in school-age students.
“Such approaches have also been linked to gains in nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, food preferences, and dietary behaviors in school-age students [65, 66].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
Study reported that programs were more likely to be successful when they included multiple strategies, parental involvement, and hands-on activities.
“Study reported that programs were more likely to be successful when they included multiple strategies, parental involvement, and hands-on activities [65].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
Programs based mainly on information delivery were less likely to produce lasting behavioral change than those that also included skills practice, family involvement, or environmental support.
“For this reason, programs based mainly on information delivery were less likely to produce lasting behavioral change than those that also included skills practice, family involvement, or environmental support [22, 39, 65, 67].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors
Kelder, S. H., Perry, C. L., Klepp, K. I., & Lytle, L. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.7.1121 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works
Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies
Eccles, M. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.1.47 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Langford, R., Bonell, C., Jones, H., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S., Waters, E., Komro, K., Gibbs, L., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Hasan, B., Thompson, W. G., Almasri, J., Wang, Z., Lakis, S., Prokop, L. J., Hensrud, D. D., Frie, K. S., Wirtz, M. J., Murad, A. L., et al. (2019) · BMC Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s40795-019-0293-8 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Day, M. E., Strange, K. S., McKay, H. A., & Naylor, P.-J. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/bf03403766 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Bontrager Yoder, A. B., Foecke, L. L., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980015000385 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Battjes-Fries, M. C., Haveman-Nies, A., Renes, R.-J., Meester, H. J., & van ’t Veer, P. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980014003012 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Varman, S. D., Cliff, D. P., Jones, R. A., Hammersley, M. L., Zhang, Z., Charlton, K., & Kelly, B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182010824 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationSchool-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review
Samad, N., Bearne, L., Noor, F. M., Akter, F., & Parmar, D. (2024) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-024-01668-6 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Karpouzis, F., Lindberg, R., Walsh, A., Shah, S., Abbott, G., & Ball, K. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18079-8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Li, S.-R., & Chang, Y.-J. (2024) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2024.41 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Posri, S., Powwattana, A., Lagampan, S., Chongsuwat, R., Boonmanunt, S. W., & Wongkampun, S. (2026) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-026-27909-w
“Study reported that programs were more likely to be successful when they included multiple strategies, parental involvement, and hands-on activities [65].”
- Authors
- Charlton, K., Comerford, T., Deavin, N., & Walton, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Charlton, Karen
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-10-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4642-4662
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- PMC
- PMC10195355
- OpenAlex
- W3092011272
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- elementary school students, nutrition education, school gardens, taste testing, cooking classes, food provisioning, vegetable consumption, dietary behaviour, nutrition knowledge, parental involvement, food security
- MeSH terms
- Child, Diet, Fruit, Humans, Schools, Vegetables, Gardening
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review