Cited by 73Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination vs. lamotrigine in the 6-month treatment of bipolar I depression

Open access
Brown, Eileen, Dunner, David L., McElroy, Susan L., Keck, Paul E., Adams, David H., Degenhardt, Elisabeth, Tohen, Mauricio, Houston, John P.·2009·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC) compared with lamotrigine (Lam) for long-term treatment of bipolar I depression, this 25-wk, randomized, double-blind study compared OFC (6/25, 6/50, 12/25, or 12/50 mg/d, n=205) with Lam titrated to 200 mg/d (n=205) in patients with bipolar I disorder, depressed. A protocol-specified analysis of 7-wk outcomes was previously reported. Outcome measures included Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) (primary), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores. OFC-treated patients had significantly greater improvement than Lam-treated patients over 25 wk on CGI-S (p=0.008), MADRS (p=0.005), and YMRS (p<0.001) scores, and from baseline across visits from week 5 (titration complete) to the end of the study on CGI-S (p=0.043), MADRS (p=0.017), and YMRS (p=0.001) scores. Of patients in remission after the 7-wk acute phase, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in the incidence of relapse (MADRS >15, p=0.528). Rate of treatment-emergent mania was not significantly different by treatment (p=0.401). OFC-treated patients had more frequent (p<0.05) somnolence, increased appetite, dry mouth, sedation, weight gain, and tremor; Lam-treated patients had more frequent insomnia. There was a significant difference in incidence of treatment-emergent cholesterol > or = 240 (p<0.001) and in weight gain of > or = 7% (p<0.001) in favour of the Lam group. Patients with bipolar I depression had significantly greater symptom improvement over 25 wk on OFC compared with Lam. There was no treatment difference in incidence of relapse. OFC-treated patients had more treatment-emergent adverse events and greater incidence of weight gain and hypercholesterolaemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145708009735

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Brown E, McElroy SL, Keck Jr. PE, Deldar A, Adams DH, Tohen M, Williamson DJ (2006). A seven-week comparison of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination versus lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar I depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67, 1025-1033.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, E., Dunner, D. L., McElroy, S. L., Keck, P. E., Adams, D. H., Degenhardt, E., Tohen, M., & Houston, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Eileen
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2008-12-11
Volume
12
Issue
06
Pages
773
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2134480650
Cited by
73
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Stanley Medical Research Institute
  • Neurocrine Biosciences
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • UCB Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar I depression, olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, lamotrigine, long-term maintenance therapy, relapse, treatment-emergent mania, weight gain, hypercholesterolemia, adverse drug reactions, atypical antipsychotics, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Lamotrigine, Adolescent, Adult, Benzodiazepines, Bipolar Disorder, Calcium Channel Blockers, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Triazines, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review