The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
Open accessAbstract
We present the first estimate of the phylogenetic relationships among all 916 extant and nine recently extinct species of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera), a group that accounts for almost one‐quarter of extant mammalian diversity. This phylogeny was derived by combining 105 estimates of bat phylogenetic relationships published since 1970 using the supertree construction technique of Matrix Representation with Parsimony (MRP). Despite the explosive growth in the number of phylogenetic studies of bats since 1990, phylogenetic relationships in the order have been studied non‐randomly. For example, over one‐third of all bat systematic studies to date have focused on relationships within Phyllostomidae, whereas relationships within clades such as Kerivoulinae and Murinae have never been studied using cladistic methods. Resolution in the supertree similarly differs among clades: overall resolution is poor (46.4% of a fully bifurcating solution) but reaches 100% in some groups (e.g. relationships within Mormoopidae). The supertree analysis does not support a recent proposal that Microchiroptera is paraphyletic with respect to Megachiroptera, as the majority of source topologies support microbat monophyly. Although it is not a substitute for comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of primary molecular and morphological data, the bat supertree provides a useful tool for future phylogenetic comparative and macroevolutionary studies. Additionally, it identifies clades that have been little studied, highlights groups within which relationships are controversial, and like all phylogenetic studies, provides preliminary hypotheses that can form starting points for future phylogenetic studies of bats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION
Bremer, K. (1988) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x · Cited by 2,534
Norberg, U. M., & Rayner, J. M. V. (1987) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1987.0030 · Cited by 1,805
The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis
Nixon, K. (1999) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.1999.0121 · Cited by 1,773
Predicting extinction risk in declining species
Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G., & Mace, G. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · Cited by 1,768
Self-citationMacclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution/Version 3
Maddison, W. P., & Maddison, D. R. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,448
Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals
Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E., Johnson, W. E., Zhang, Y. P., Ryder, O. A., & O'Brien, S. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35054550 · Cited by 1,369
Pääbo, S. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90328-n · Cited by 1,358
Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation.
Gottlieb, L. D., Givnish, T. J., & Sytsma, K. J. (1998) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2419593 · Cited by 916
Cited by
A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis.
(2006) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-99 · Cited by 475
The evolution of echolocation in bats
JONES, G., & TEELING, E. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.001 · Cited by 470
Sexual size dimorphism in birds
Székely, T., Lislevand, T., & Figuerola, J. (2007) · Sex, Size and Gender Roles · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0004 · Cited by 160
Live and Wet Markets: Food Access versus the Risk of Disease Emergence
Naguib, M. M., Li, R., Ling, J., Grace, D., Nguyen-Viet, H., & Lindahl, J. F. (2021) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.007 · Cited by 106
Neurobiology of echolocation in bats
Moss, C. F., & Sinha, S. R. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.016 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, K. E., PURVIS, A., MacLARNON, A., BININDA‐EMONDS, O. R. P., & SIMMONS, N. B.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-259
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2142943897
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1464793101005899
- The paper
- JONES, K. E., PURVIS, A., MacLARNON, A., BININDA‐EMONDS, O. R. P., & SIMMONS, N. B. (2002). A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793101005899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.