Cited by 106Zoonotic diseases and public healthFood Safety and HygieneViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

Live and Wet Markets: Food Access versus the Risk of Disease Emergence

Open access
Naguib, Mahmoud M., Li, Ruiyun, Ling, Jiaxin, Grace, Delia, Nguyen-Viet, Hung, Lindahl, Johanna F.·2021·Trends in Microbiology

Abstract

Emerging zoonotic diseases exert a significant burden on human health and have considerable socioeconomic impact worldwide. In Asia, live animals as well as animal products are commonly sold in informal markets. The interaction of humans, live domestic animals for sale, food products, and wild and scavenging animals, creates a risk for emerging infectious diseases. Such markets have been in the spotlight as sources of zoonotic viruses, for example, avian influenza viruses and coronaviruses, Here, we bring data together on the global impact of live and wet markets on the emergence of zoonotic diseases. We discuss how benefits can be maximized and risks minimized and conclude that current regulations should be implemented or revised, to mitigate the risk of new diseases emerging in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.007

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informal, traditional fresh produce markets have many benefits for local populations, including low prices, ease of access, availability of preferred fresh and traditional foods, income-earning opportunities for women, worker independence, and attractions for tourists.

    “Informal, traditional fresh produce markets have many benefits for local populations, including low prices, ease of access, availability of preferred fresh and traditional foods, income-earning opportunities for women, worker independence, and attractions for tourists (Naguib et al., 2021).”

    From Burden of foodborne disease in low-income and middle-income countries and opportunities for scaling food safety interventions (2023) · cites this paper as Naguib et al., 2021

    In “Live and Wet Markets and Emerging Diseases” (page unavailable), the paper describes accessible markets offering traditional, well-liked foods and attracting tourists. In “Is This the Final Call for Live Animal Market Closure?” (page unavailable), it identifies low prices, accessibility, and livelihoods as benefits. It does not substantiate income-earning opportunities specifically for women or worker independence, and its discussion centers on live and wet markets rather than fresh-produce markets specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Roesel K. Grace D. Food Safety and Informal Markets 1st edn 2015 Routledge

Authors
Naguib, M. M., Li, R., Ling, J., Grace, D., Nguyen-Viet, H., & Lindahl, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
Corresponding author
Lindahl, Johanna F.
Venue
Trends in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
573-581
ISSN
0966-842X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135358412
Cited by
106
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2016-00364, 2018–02569)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-00364, 2018–02569)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
live animal markets, wet markets, zoonoses, emerging infectious diseases, food access, avian influenza, coronavirus, market regulation, informal markets
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Animals, Asia, Birds, Commerce, Crowding, Food, Influenza in Birds, Humans, Influenza, Human, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Zoonoses, Communicable Diseases, Emerging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review