Managing kinship over long distances: the significance of “the visit”
Abstract
This article explores the meaning of ‘the visit’ to Pakistan by a sample of people living in the North of England, with relatives in Pakistan. It argues that the visit has a particular symbolic and practical significance in the maintenance of transnational kin relationships. Visiting involves travelling and ‘co-presence’ with people, as well as in a place – in this case, Pakistan. It is particularly important in the process of ‘knowing’ one's geographically distant relatives, and in ‘doing things together’ and ‘being there at key moments’. These elements are woven together with other ways of keeping in touch in between visits, and help to sustain family narratives of ‘the regular visit’ and the kinship network that is active over distances and over time. The visit was also important in helping to confirm a sense of belonging or affinity with Pakistan, even though for many in the study England was seen as home. However, visiting involves complex and sometimes difficult sets of negotiations and decisions about propriety, morality, exchange, and belonging in transnational kin relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies point to diverse ways in which family members maintain a feeling of co-presence through long-distance communication, such as telephone calls, text messages, letters, remittances, photos, and visits.
“Such studies point to the diverse ways in which family members maintain a feeling of co-presence through long-distance communication, such as telephone calls, text messages, letters, remittances, photos, and visits (Baldassar 2007;Mason 2004;Parreñas 2005;Zontini 2004).”
From Navigating transnational childcare relationships: migrant parents and their children's caregivers in the origin country (2017) · cites this paper as Mason 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Central Themes in the Study of Transnational Parenthood
Carling, J., Menjívar, C., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2012.646417 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
POEZE, M., DANKYI, E. K., & MAZZUCATO, V. (2017) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12135 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Barglowski, K., Krzyżowski, Ł., & Świątek, P. (2015) · Population, Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.1904 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mason, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mason, Jennifer
- ORCID
- Mason, Jennifer
- Venue
- Social Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-429
- ISSN
- 1474-7464 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3073
- OpenAlex
- W2103706576
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Policy and Society (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Keywords
- transnational kinship, family visits, Pakistani diaspora, Northern England, sense of belonging, co-presence, family narratives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review