Cited by 7Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Deathbed experiences and meaning-making: Perspectives of family caregivers of patients who received cancer palliative care

Teo, Irene, Paramasivam, Keerthana, Chee, Wai Yee, Ng, Carolyn, Neo, Patricia Soek Hui, Lee, Geok Ling·2024·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objectives: The deathbed symbolizes a time when the patient is dangerously ill and where death is imminent. The memories of family caregivers during this time can potentially shape their meaning-making of the patient’s death and bereavement adjustment. We aimed to understand the experiences of family caregivers at the deathbed of patients receiving palliative care. We also examined caregiver’s meaning-making that occurred after the patient’s death. Methods: In this retrospective qualitative study, family caregivers of cancer patients who received palliative care in Singapore were recruited through purposive sampling. In-person, semi-structured interviews were individually conducted with study participants to understand their experiences from a caregiver’s perspective before and after the death of the patient. Thematic content analysis method was conducted. Results: A total of 25 bereaved family caregivers were interviewed, with spouses, adult children, and others comprising one-third each of the sample. Six themes emerged from caregivers’ recollected experiences around the patient deathbed: Lasting image of the patient, A time of intense emotions, Healthcare providers prepare caregivers, A time for saying goodbye, Rituals provide comfort, and Impact on family ties. Four themes emerged surrounding post-loss meaning-making: An end to the pain and suffering, “Have I done enough?,” Significance in the timing of events, and Gaining strength and personal growth. Significance of results: The deathbed is a salient time for family caregivers as they prepare for patient’s death. There are opportunities to provide support to the family based on the study findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951523001670

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, I., Paramasivam, K., Chee, W. Y., Ng, C., Neo, P. S. H., & Lee, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Teo, Irene
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2023-12-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
444-450
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W4389395032
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
family caregivers, cancer palliative care, meaning-making, bereavement adjustment, caregiver experiences, farewell, ritual, family ties, end-of-life care, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Death, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Retrospective Studies, Singapore, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review