The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participatory Democracy Revisited
Abstract
Over the past two decades we have heard an historically unprecedented volume of talk about and praise of democracy, and many governmental, non-governmental, and international organizations have been engaged in democracy promotion. Democracy is a subject that crosses the boundaries in political science, and within my own field of political theory there has been a major revival of democratic theory. In political theory, argument about “democracy” is usually now qualified by one of an array of adjectives, which include cosmopolitan, agonistic, republican, and monitory. But the new form that has been by far the most successful is deliberative democracy. By 2007 John Dryzek could write that “deliberative democracy now constitutes the most active area of political theory in its entirety (not just democratic theory).” Not only is there an extremely large and rapidly growing literature, both theoretical and empirical, on deliberative democracy, but its influence has spread far outside universities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Self-citation
Cited by
A conceptual map of political participation
van Deth, J. W. (2014) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/ap.2014.6 · Cited by 610
Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement
Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014 · Cited by 332
Schmidt, V., & Wood, M. (2019) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12615 · Cited by 266
Introduction: Embedding participatory governance
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179 · Cited by 144
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Oser, J. (2017) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8 · Cited by 75
Vrydagh, J. (2022) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w · Cited by 51
Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting
Johnson, C., Carlson, H. J., & Reynolds, S. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w · Cited by 46
The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment in Authoritarian Regimes
Bastiaens, I. (2016) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050629.2015.1065699 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pateman, C.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-19
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2109088336
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 219.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.