Cited by 29International Business and FDIInternational Arbitration and Investment LawPolitical Conflict and Governance

The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment in Authoritarian Regimes

Bastiaens, Ida·2016·International Interactions

Abstract

While political scientists find that democracy reduces political risk, little scholarship analyzes how authoritarian regimes attract foreign direct investment (FDI). This article argues that while authoritarian countries are generally risky, this risk can be minimized when authoritarian regimes are constrained from both “above” and “below.” Signing international investment treaties are critical for authoritarian countries to signal a commitment to FDI-friendly policies. However, only authoritarian signatories that allow some degree of public deliberation in their policymaking are then constrained from deviating from the policies of the international investment treaties. Panel statistical regressions and a case analysis support the hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03050629.2015.1065699

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bastiaens, I.
Affiliations
Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Bastiaens, Ida
Venue
International Interactions
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
140-171
ISSN
  • 0305-0629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7444
OpenAlex
W57555698
Cited by
29
References
183
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Interactions (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Pittsburgh (International Business Center)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Arbitration and Investment Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
foreign direct investment, authoritarian regimes, political risk, investment treaties, public deliberation, policy constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review