The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism
Abstract
Presidential election years attract attention to the rhetoric, personalities, and agendas of contending White House aspirants, but these headlines do not reflect the ongoing political shifts that will confront whoever moves into the White House in 2017. Earthquakes and erosions have remade the U.S. political terrain, reconfiguring the ground on which politicians and social groups must maneuver, and it is important to make sure that narrow and short-term analyses do not blind us to this shifting terrain. We draw from research on changes since 2000 in the organizational universes surrounding the Republican and Democratic parties to highlight a major emergent force in U.S. politics: the recently expanded “Koch network” that coordinates big money funders, idea producers, issue advocates, and innovative constituency-building efforts in an ongoing effort to pull the Republican Party and agendas of U.S. politics sharply to the right. We review the major components and evolution of the Koch network and explore how it has reshaped American politics and policy agendas, focusing especially on implications for right-tilted partisan polarization and rising economic inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714001595 · Cited by 2,700
A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585829 · Cited by 491
Self-citation
Cited by
Madison's Constitution Under Stress: A Developmental Analysis of Political Polarization
Pierson, P., & Schickler, E. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033629 · Cited by 135
American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy
Pierson, P. (2017) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12323 · Cited by 126
Challenges to Subnational Democracy in the United States, Past and Present
Mickey, R. (2022) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162211072952 · Cited by 26
Interest Group Activists and the Polarization of State Legislatures
Grumbach, J. M. (2020) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/lsq.12244 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Skocpol, T., & Hertel-Fernandez, A.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-08-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 681-699
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2514342720
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 127.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1537592716001122
- The paper
- Skocpol, T., & Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016). The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592716001122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.