The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States
Open accessAbstract
I use the case of the transportation network company Uber as a lens to explore the comparative politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Within the advanced capitalist world, different countries have responded in very different ways to this new service, from welcome embrace and accommodating regulatory adjustments to complete rejection and legal bans. I analyze Uber’s arrival and reception in the United States, Germany, and Sweden, documenting three very different responses to this disruptive new actor. I show that conflicts over Uber centered on different issues in the three countries. These differences were consequential because the specific regulatory “flashpoints”that Uber provoked mobilized different actors, inspired the formation of different coalitions, and shaped the terms on which conflicts over Uber were framed and fought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017) · Finance and Society · doi:10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936 · Cited by 989
Systematic Process Analysis: when and how to use it
Hall, P. A. (2008) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210130 · Cited by 143 · cited 1×
“22 On case studies, see George and Bennett 2005; on process tracing see Hall 2006.”
Background
Cited by
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354
The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism
Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019) · Politics & Society · doi:10.1177/0032329219838932 · Cited by 522
Self-citationDigital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda
Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12326 · Cited by 512
An Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020) · Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066005 · Cited by 118
Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms
Gegenhuber, T., Ellmer, M., & Schüßler, E. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726720915761 · Cited by 115
Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences
Deranty, J.-P., & Corbin, T. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x · Cited by 118
“…intervening in formal legislative processes through lobbying, challenging legal decisions, mobilising their customer base (Schor and Vallas 2020; Thelen 2018; Collier et al. 2017, 2018), or even directly flexing their digital muscle against cities, regions and even nation states (such as…”
BUSEMEYER, M. R., & SAHM, A. H. J. (2022) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279421000519 · Cited by 75
Political Power of Digital Transnational Corporations: To the Problem of Research
Zaytsev, S. Y. (2023) · RUDN Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.22363/2312-8313-2023-10-1-116-129 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Thelen, K.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 938-953
- ISSN
- 1537-5927 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0986
- OpenAlex
- W2900677429
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 72.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
