Cited by 14Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities

SHIFTING POWER

Remster, Brianna, Kramer, Rory·2018·Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Abstract

While prisoners cannot vote, they are counted as residents of the often rural legislative districts where they are incarcerated rather than their home districts. We examine the extent to which incarceration shifts the balance of a representative democracy by considering its impact on legislative apportionment. Drawing on data from the Census, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and Pennsylvania Redistricting Commission, we develop a counterfactual framework to examine whether removing and returning prisoners to their home districts affects equal representation. Because prisoners are disproportionately African American, we also employ this counterfactual to assess racial differences in the impact of prison gerrymandering. Findings indicate that incarceration shifts political power from urban districts to suburban and rural districts through legislative apportionment. Moreover, non-White communities suffer the most. We conclude by considering how our findings fit a growing literature on the role of mass incarceration in [re]producing racial inequalities in the contemporary United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742058x18000206

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Remster, B., & Kramer, R.
Affiliations
Villanova University (US)
Corresponding author
Remster, Brianna
Venue
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
Published
2018
Volume
15
Issue
02
Pages
417-439
ISSN
  • 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-0598
OpenAlex
W2954967930
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Keywords
incarceration, legislative apportionment, equal representation, mass incarceration, racial inequality, African American prisoners, counterfactual analysis, redistricting, Pennsylvania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review