Cited by 747Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Incarceration and Stratification

Wakefield, Sara, Uggen, Christopher·2010·Annual Review of Sociology

Abstract

In the past three decades, incarceration has become an increasingly powerful force for reproducing and reinforcing social inequalities. A new wave of sociological research details the contemporary experiment with mass incarceration in the United States and its attendant effects on social stratification. This review first describes the scope of imprisonment and the process of selection into prison. It then considers the implications of the prison boom for understanding inequalities in the labor market, educational attainment, health, families, and the intergenerational transmission of inequality. Social researchers have long understood selection into prison as a reflection of existing stratification processes. Today, research attention has shifted to the role of punishment in generating these inequalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who have lower levels of education, employment, and income are more likely to encounter the criminal justice system.

    “due to discriminatory application of policies and laws, individuals who have lower levels of education, employment, and income are more likely to encounter the CJS (Wakefield & Uggen, 2010).”

    From Adult Outcomes of Justice Involved Indigenous Youth (2023) · cites this paper as Wakefield & Uggen, 2010

  • There continues to be a cycle of inequality among Indigenous individuals that is perpetuated and effectively solidified through the criminal justice system.

    “Therefore, there continues to be a cycle of inequality (Wakefield & Uggen, 2010) among Indigenous individuals that is perpetuated and effectively solidified through the CJS.”

    From Adult Outcomes of Justice Involved Indigenous Youth (2023) · cites this paper as Wakefield & Uggen, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
387-406
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
OpenAlex
W2124160730
Cited by
747
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
mass incarceration, social stratification, social inequality, prison population, labor market inequality, educational attainment, health disparities, family breakdown, intergenerational transmission of inequality, punishment, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review