Cited by 186Gender Politics and RepresentationGender Diversity and InequalityGender and Feminist Studies

Gender and political leadership in a time of COVID

Open access
Johnson, Carol, Williams, Blair·2020·Politics & Gender

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has undermined the division between the private sphere of the home and the public sphere of politics that has traditionally disadvantaged women political leaders. Whereas male political leaders historically drew on their traditional role as the male head of household to display forms of masculine protectionism toward citizens, women leaders are now able to draw on their traditional motherly role—for example, as the member of the household who traditionally cares for the sick—to display forms of feminine protectionism. As a result, international women leaders have managed to leverage women's role in the home to their advantage in the political sphere. Significantly, an appreciation of traditionally feminine attributes in women political leaders has been displayed in much media coverage, providing more favorable coverage of female political leaders than was previously the case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1743923x2000029x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-26.
  2. Joyce P. Kaufman and Kristen P. Williams. London: Routledge, 1-13.
  3. Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  4. Solberg, Erna. 2020. "Introduction at Press Conference for Children." March 23. https:// www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/norwegian-prime-minister-erna-solbergs-introduction- at-press-conference-for-children/id2693742/ (accessed August 24, 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, C., & Williams, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Politics & Gender
Published
2020-06-10
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
943-950
ISSN
  • 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9248
OpenAlex
W3033749922
Cited by
186
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7
FWCI
37.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Politics & Gender (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
women politicians, COVID-19 pandemic, gender and leadership, public sphere, private sphere, motherhood, gender roles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review