The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International practices
Abstract
In this article, we approach world politics through the lens of its manifold practices, which we define as competent performances. Studying International Relations (IR) from the perspective of international practices promises three key advances. First, by focusing on practices in IR, we can understand both IR theory and international politics better or differently. World politics can be conceived as structured by practices, which give meaning to international action, make possible strategic interaction, and are reproduced, changed, and reinforced by international action and interaction. This focus helps broaden the ontology of world politics, serves as a focal point around which debates in IR theory can be structured, and can be used as a unit of analysis that transcends traditional understandings of ‘levels of analysis’. We illustrate what an international practice is by revisiting Thomas Schelling's seminal works on bargaining. Second, with the help of illustrations of deterrence and arms control during the Cold War and of post-Cold War practices such as cooperative security, we show how practices constitute strategic interaction and bargaining more generally. Finally, a practice perspective opens an exciting and innovative research agenda, which suggests new research questions and puzzles, and revisits central concepts of our discipline, including power, history, and strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics
Ashley, R. K. (1987) · Alternatives: Global, Local, Political · doi:10.1177/030437548701200401 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Adler-Nissen, R. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000337 · Cited by 585
The Rise of International Regime Complexity
Alter, K. J., & Raustiala, K. (2018) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030830 · Cited by 409
International practices: introduction and framework
Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011) · International Practices · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511862373.003 · Cited by 264
Self-citationExtraterritorial authoritarian practices: a framework
Glasius, M. (2018) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2017.1403781 · Cited by 202
The territorialization of cyberspace
Lambach, D. (2020) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viz022 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Adler, E., & Pouliot, V.
- Venue
- International Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 1752-9719 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-9727
- OpenAlex
- W4238788511
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 187.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s175297191000031x
- The paper
- Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175297191000031x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.