The territorialization of cyberspace
Abstract
There are widespread worries about the impending fragmentation of the internet. Reviewing the IR literature on cyberspace and internet governance, this paper demonstrates that these debates rest on very traditional understandings of territory and the state, focusing on ways that hard-shelled “power containers” are recreated in cyberspace. Using a practice-oriented conceptual framework drawing on insights from critical geography, the paper highlights how state, corporate, and private actors deterritorialize and reterritorialize cyberspace. Results indicate that there are multiple ways to territorialize cyberspace beyond the reconstruction of the “national territory” and that a multitude of actors engage in territorializing practices. This allows for a more nuanced reevaluation of the “internet fragmentation” discourse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evolution from singular, separate retail channels to interwoven sets of digital and real-life spaces reflects a fluid and adaptable practice.
“The evolution from singular, separate retail channels (places) to interwoven sets of digital and real-life spaces (Lambach, 2020) reflects this fluid and adaptable practice.”
From Retail futures: Customer experience, phygital retailing, and the Experiential Retail Territories perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Lambach, 2020
The territorial perspective captures the proliferation of borders and mobilities and their fluid practices, with retail territories evolving and social space and action becoming inextricable in lived experience.
“The territorial perspective captures the proliferation of borders and mobilities (Brighenti, 2014) and their fluid practices (Lambach, 2020), with retail territories evolving, where social space and action become inextricable, as part of a person's lived experience in embodied spaces (Cohen, 2007).”
From Retail futures: Customer experience, phygital retailing, and the Experiential Retail Territories perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Lambach, 2020
Cites
Rid, T. (2012) · Journal of Strategic Studies · doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.608939 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
The Global War for Internet Governance
DeNardis, L. (2014) · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300181357.001.0001 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Colonial reflection’ and territoriality: The peripheral origins of sovereign statehood
Branch, J. (2012) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066110383997 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What’s in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity
Branch, J. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081832000051x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Alexander, B., & Varley, R. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104108 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lambach, D.
- Affiliations
- Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
- ORCID
- Lambach, Daniel
- Venue
- International Studies Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 482-506
- ISSN
- 1521-9488
- 1468-2486
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review