The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theorizing emotions in world politics
Abstract
Emotions play an increasingly important role in international relations research. This essay briefly surveys the development of the respective debates and then offers a path forward. The key challenge, we argue, is to theorize the processes through which individual emotions become collective and political. We further suggest that this is done best by exploring insights from two seemingly incompatible scholarly tendencies: macro theoretical approaches that develop generalizable propositions about political emotions and, in contrast, micro approaches that investigate how specific emotions function in specific circumstances. Applying this framework we then identify four realms that are central to appreciating the political significance of emotions: (1) the importance of definitions; (2) the role of the body; (3) questions of representation; and (4) the intertwining of emotions and power. Taken together, these building blocks reveal how emotions permeate world politics in complex and interwoven ways and also, once taken seriously, challenge many entrenched assumptions of international relations scholarship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
Ahmed, S. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748691142 · Cited by 8,060
The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-6553 · Cited by 5,998
Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure
Hochschild, A. R. (1979) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/227049 · Cited by 5,962
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, S. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203700372 · Cited by 4,720
Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation
Massumi, B. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822383574 · Cited by 4,627
Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840715 · Cited by 4,347
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Scherer, K. R. (2005) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018405058216 · Cited by 4,264
Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1946 · Cited by 3,771
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4883 · Cited by 3,163
Cited by
Positionality Statements as a Function of Coloniality: Interrogating Reflexive Methodologies
Gani, J. K., & Khan, R. M. (2024) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqae038 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R.
- Venue
- International Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 491-514
- ISSN
- 1752-9719 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-9727
- OpenAlex
- W2121144663
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 156.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theorizing emotions in world politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1752971914000232
- The paper
- Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing emotions in world politics. International Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971914000232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.