The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption
Abstract
Abstract One striking finding from recent natural environmental management research is that family firms are more likely to engage in environmentally friendly practices. However, the source of such difference is less clear. The primary objective of our research is to investigate if family firms react to stakeholder pressures differently when making natural environmental management decisions. We survey 235 manufacturing firms from the chemical, and the electronic and information technology industries in Taiwan to test our hypotheses. The results of regression analysis show that family firms pay much more attention to their internal stakeholders than non-family firms. This finding complements the current discussions on family business uniqueness. It also contributes to provide a more comprehensive framework of stakeholder salience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
Cited by
Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going
Dangelico, R. M. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1886 · Cited by 676
Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research
Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12192 · Cited by 495
Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China
Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046 · Cited by 458
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
Wu, G. (2013) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2012-0201 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Y., Ding, H.-B., & Kao, M.-R.
- Venue
- Journal of Management & Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-326
- ISSN
- 1324-3209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154620941
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1833367200002649
- The paper
- Huang, Y., Ding, H.-B., & Kao, M.-R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200002649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
