The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical treatment for rejection of deviant values: critical values of Dixon's "Q" parameter and related subrange ratios at the 95% confidence level
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTStatistical treatment for rejection of deviant values: critical values of Dixon's "Q" parameter and related subrange ratios at the 95% confidence levelDavid B. RorabacherCite this: Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2, 139–146Publication Date (Print):January 15, 1991Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 15 January 1991https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac00002a010https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00002a010research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views7120Altmetric-Citations318LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics
Old, W. M., Meyer-Arendt, K., Aveline-Wolf, L., Pierce, K. G., Mendoza, A., Sevinsky, J. R., Resing, K. A., & Ahn, N. G. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500084-mcp200 · Cited by 1,206
Ritter, A., & Muñoz-Carpena, R. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004 · Cited by 991
Metabolic Labeling of Mammalian Organisms with Stable Isotopes for Quantitative Proteomic Analysis
Wu, C. C., MacCoss, M. J., Howell, K. E., Matthews, D. E., & Yates, J. R. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac049208j · Cited by 386
Exposing the Limitations of Molecular Machine Learning with Activity Cliffs
van Tilborg, D., Alenicheva, A., & Grisoni, F. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01073 · Cited by 337
Molecular classification of endometriosis and disease stage using high-dimensional genomic data
Tamaresis, J. S., Irwin, J. C., Goldfien, G. A., Rabban, J. T., Burney, R. O., Nezhat, C., DePaolo, L. V., & Giudice, L. C. (2014) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2014-1490 · Cited by 168
Weimer, P. J., Cox, M. S., Vieira de Paula, T., Lin, M., Hall, M. B., & Suen, G. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12746 · Cited by 86
Drake, R. J., Day, C. J., Picucci, R., Warburton, J., Larkin, W., Husain, N., Reeder, C., Wykes, T., & Marshall, M. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002559 · Cited by 58
Coura, R. S., Cressant, A., Xia, J., de Chaumont, F., Olivo‐Marin, J. C., Pelloux, Y., Dalley, J. W., & Granon, S. (2013) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.13-231084 · Cited by 33
“Dixon’s Q test (38) was used before any other statistical treatment to objectively detect a single outlier within a group of data for which a gaussian distribution applies.”
BackgroundMethodHuman Neuraminidase Isoenzymes Show Variable Activities for 9-O-Acetyl-sialoside Substrates
Hunter, C. D., Khanna, N., Richards, M. R., Rezaei Darestani, R., Zou, C., Klassen, J. S., & Cairo, C. W. (2018) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00952 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Rorabacher, D. B.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1991-01-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2019729351
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
