Cited by 337Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceMachine Learning in Healthcare

Exposing the Limitations of Molecular Machine Learning with Activity Cliffs

Open access
van Tilborg, Derek, Alenicheva, Alisa, Grisoni, Francesca·2022·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

, to predict molecular properties, such as bioactivity, with high accuracy. However, activity cliffs─pairs of molecules that are highly similar in their structure but exhibit large differences in potency─have received limited attention for their effect on model performance. Not only are these edge cases informative for molecule discovery and optimization but also models that are well equipped to accurately predict the potency of activity cliffs have increased potential for prospective applications. Our work aims to fill the current knowledge gap on best-practice machine learning methods in the presence of activity cliffs. We benchmarked a total of 24 machine and deep learning approaches on curated bioactivity data from 30 macromolecular targets for their performance on activity cliff compounds. While all methods struggled in the presence of activity cliffs, machine learning approaches based on molecular descriptors outperformed more complex deep learning methods. Our findings highlight large case-by-case differences in performance, advocating for (a) the inclusion of dedicated "activity-cliff-centered" metrics during model development and evaluation and (b) the development of novel algorithms to better predict the properties of activity cliffs. To this end, the methods, metrics, and results of this study have been encapsulated into an open-access benchmarking platform named MoleculeACE (Activity Cliff Estimation, available on GitHub at: https://github.com/molML/MoleculeACE). MoleculeACE is designed to steer the community toward addressing the pressing but overlooked limitation of molecular machine learning models posed by activity cliffs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01073

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Tilborg, D., Alenicheva, A., & Grisoni, F.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Complex Molecular Systems and Dept. Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612AZEindhoven, The Netherlands
  • JetBrains Research, 194100Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Grisoni, Francesca
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2022-12-01
Volume
62
Issue
23
Pages
5938-5951
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4310603653
Cited by
337
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 9
FWCI
32.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
  • JetBrains Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
activity cliffs, molecular machine learning, bioactivity prediction, molecular descriptors, deep learning, model benchmarking, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review