The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utility of Accurate Mass Tags for Proteome-Wide Protein Identification
Abstract
An enabling capability for proteomics would be the ability to study protein expression on a global scale. While several different separation and analysis options are being investigated to advance the practice of proteomics, mass spectrometry (MS) is rapidly becoming the core instrumental technology used to characterize the large number of proteins that constitute a proteome. To be most effective, proteomic measurements must be high-throughput, ideally allowing thousands of proteins to be identified on a time scale of hours. Most strategies of identification by MS rely on the analysis of enzymatically produced peptides originating from an isolated protein followed by either peptide mapping or tandem MS (MS/MS) to obtain sequence information for a single peptide. In the case of peptide mapping, several peptide masses are needed to unambiguously identify a protein with the typically achieved mass measurement accuracies (MMA). The ability to identify proteins based on the mass of a single peptide (i.e., an accurate mass tag; AMT) is proposed and is largely dependent on the MMA that can be achieved. To determine the MMA necessary to enable the use of AMTs for proteome-wide protein identification, we analyzed the predicted proteins and their tryptic fragments from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans. The results show that low ppm (i.e., approximately 1 ppm) level measurements have practical utility for analysis of small proteomes. Additionally, up to 85% of the peptides predicted from these organisms can function as AMTs at sub-ppm MMA levels attainable using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS. Additional information, such as sequence constraints, should enable even more complex proteomes to be studied at more modest mass measurement accuracies. Once AMTs are established, subsequent high-throughput measurements of proteomes (e.g., after perturbations) will be greatly facilitated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Cited by
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
The genetics and genomics of cancer
Balmain, A., Gray, J., & Ponder, B. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1107 · Cited by 573
Precision proteomics: The case for high resolution and high mass accuracy
Mann, M., & Kelleher, N. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800788105 · Cited by 450
Proteomics and Immunological Analysis of a Novel Shrimp Allergen, Pen m 2
Yu, C.-J., Lin, Y.-F., Chiang, B.-L., & Chow, L.-P. (2003) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.445 · Cited by 289
Zhu, Y., Dou, M., Piehowski, P. D., Liang, Y., Wang, F., Chu, R. K., Chrisler, W. B., Smith, J. N., Schwarz, K. C., Shen, Y., et al. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.tir118.000686 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Conrads, T. P., Anderson, G. A., Veenstra, T. D., Paša-Tolić, L., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06-17
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3349-3354
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1982535455
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of Accurate Mass Tags for Proteome-Wide Protein Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0002386
- The paper
- Conrads, T. P., Anderson, G. A., Veenstra, T. D., Paša-Tolić, L., & Smith, R. D. (2000). Utility of Accurate Mass Tags for Proteome-Wide Protein Identification. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0002386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.