The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proteolytic 18O Labeling for Comparative Proteomics: Model Studies with Two Serotypes of Adenovirus
Abstract
A new method for proteolytic stable isotope labeling is introduced to provide quantitative and concurrent comparisons between individual proteins from two entire proteome pools or their subfractions. Two 18O atoms are incorporated universally into the carboxyl termini of all tryptic peptides during the proteolytic cleavage of all proteins in the first pool. Proteins in the second pool are cleaved analogously with the carboxyl termini of the resulting peptides containing two 16O atoms (i.e., no labeling). The two peptide mixtures are pooled for fractionation and separation, and the masses and isotope ratios of each peptide pair (differing by 4 Da) are measured by high-resolution mass spectrometry. Short sequences and/or accurate mass measurements combined with proteomics software tools allow the peptides to be related to the precursor proteins from which they are derived. Relative signal intensities of paired peptides quantify the expression levels of their precursor proteins from proteome pools to be compared, using an equation described in the paper. Observation of individual (unpaired) peptides is mainly interpreted as differential modification or sequence variation for the protein from the respective proteome pool. The method is evaluated here in a comparison of virion proteins for two serotypes (Ad5 and Ad2) of adenovirus, taking advantage of information already available about protein sequences and concentrations. In general, proteolytic 18O labeling enables a shotgun approach for proteomic studies with quantitation capability and is proposed as a useful tool for comparative proteomic studies of very complex protein mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Absolute Quantification of Proteins by LCMSE
Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G.-Z., Vissers, J. P. C., & Geromanos, S. J. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500230-mcp200 · Cited by 1,529
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Krokhin, O. V., Craig, R., Spicer, V., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., Beavis, R. C., & Wilkins, J. A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400031-mcp200 · Cited by 284
Metabolic Labeling of Proteins for Proteomics
Beynon, R. J., & Pratt, J. M. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400010-mcp200 · Cited by 205
Diamond, D. L., Jacobs, J. M., Paeper, B., Proll, S. C., Gritsenko, M. A., Carithers, R. L., Larson, A. M., Yeh, M. M., Camp, D. G., Smith, R. D., et al. (2007) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21751 · Cited by 114
Wu, Q., Yuan, H., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2012) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.04.010 · Cited by 94
The Impact of Mass Spectrometry–Based Proteomics on Fundamental Discoveries in Virology
Greco, T. M., Diner, B. A., & Cristea, I. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Virology · doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085527 · Cited by 67
“A noteworthy exception was the comparison of adenovirus subtypes using isotope-labeled (18O) water by the Fenselau laboratory (13), an early application of 18O for comparative quantitative proteomics of complex biological samples.”
BackgroundMixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC–MS proteomics studies
Daly, D. S., Anderson, K. K., Panisko, E. A., Purvine, S. O., Fang, R., Monroe, M. E., & Baker, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070441i · Cited by 50
Wu, P., Zhao, Y., Haidacher, S. J., Wang, E., Parsley, M. O., Gao, J., Sadygov, R. G., Starkey, J. M., Luxon, B. A., Spratt, H., et al. (2013) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2391 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, X., Freas, A., Ramirez, J., Demirev, P. A., & Fenselau, C.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-05-02
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2836-2842
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2006419756
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.