The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metal Nanoparticle-Based Electrochemical Stripping Potentiometric Detection of DNA Hybridization
Abstract
A new nanoparticle-based electrical detection of DNA hybridization, based on electrochemical stripping detection of the colloidal gold tag, is described. In this protocol, the hybridization of a target oligonucleotide to magnetic bead-linked oligonucleotide probes is followed by binding of the streptavidin-coated metal nanoparticles to the captured DNA, dissolution of the nanometer-sized gold tag, and potentiometric stripping measurements of the dissolved metal tag at single-use thick-film carbon electrodes. An advanced magnetic processing technique is used to isolate the DNA duplex and to provide low-volume mixing. The influence of relevant experimental variables, including the amounts of the gold nanoparticles and the magnetic beads, the duration of the hybridization and gold dissolution steps, and the parameters of the potentiometric stripping operation upon the hybridization signal, is examined and optimized. Transmission electron microscopy micrographs indicate that the hybridization event leads to the bridging of the gold nanoparticles to the magnetic beads. Further signal amplification, and lowering of the detection limits to the nanomolar and picomolar domains, are achieved by precipitating gold or silver, respectively, onto the colloidal gold label. The new electrochemical stripping metallogenomagnetic protocol couples the inherent signal amplification of stripping metal analysis with discrimination against nonhybridized DNA, the use of microliter sample volumes, and disposable transducers and, hence, offers great promise for decentralized genetic testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics
Wang, J. (2006) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.027 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citationGold nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors
Pingarrón, J. M., Yáñez-Sedeño, P., & González-Cortés, A. (2008) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.005 · Cited by 965
Nano-Flares: Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells
Seferos, D. S., Giljohann, D. A., Hill, H. D., Prigodich, A. E., & Mirkin, C. A. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0776529 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Xu, D., Kawde, A.-N., & Polsky, R.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-10-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5576-5581
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2169088140
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal Nanoparticle-Based Electrochemical Stripping Potentiometric Detection of DNA Hybridization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0107148
- The paper
- Wang, J., Xu, D., Kawde, A.-N., & Polsky, R. (2001). Metal Nanoparticle-Based Electrochemical Stripping Potentiometric Detection of DNA Hybridization. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0107148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.