The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cleavage N-Terminal to Proline: Analysis of a Database of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra
Abstract
Fragmentation at the Xxx-Pro bond was analyzed for a group of peptide mass spectra that were acquired in a Finnigan ion trap mass spectrometer and were generated from proteins digested by enzymes and identified by the Sequest algorithm. Cleavage with formation of a + b + y ions occurred more readily at the Xxx-Pro bond than at other locations in these peptides, and the importance of this cleavage varied by the identity of Xxx. The most abundant Xxx-Pro relative bond cleavage ratios were observed when Xxx was Val, His, Asp, Ile, and Leu, whereas the least abundant cleavage ratios occurred when Xxx was Gly or Pro. Rationalization for these cleavage ratios at Xxx-Pro may include contribution of the Asp or His side chain to enhanced cleavage or the conformation of Pro, Gly, and the aliphatic residues Val, Ile, and Leu at the Xxx location in the Xxx-Pro bond. Although unusual fragmentation behavior has been noted for Pro-containing peptides, this analysis suggests that fragmentation at the Xxx-Pro bond is predictable and that this information may be used to improve the identification of proteins if it is incorporated into peptide sequencing algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers.
Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., & Chait, B. T. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00024a716 · Cited by 1,930
Influence of proline residues on protein conformation
MacArthur, M. W., & Thornton, J. M. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics
Mallick, P., Schirle, M., Chen, S. S., Flory, M. R., Lee, H., Martin, D., Ranish, J., Raught, B., Schmitt, R., Werner, T., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1275 · Cited by 695
Rauniyar, N. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms161226120 · Cited by 406
“Also, in case of proline-containing peptides, fragmentation at the N-terminal side of proline residue in a mass spectrometer generates an intense fragment ion; the fragment ion peak is dramatically over-represented in the MS/MS spectra (Figure 2a) [33].”
BackgroundProteomics of Integral Membrane ProteinsTheory and Application
Speers, A. E., & Wu, C. C. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068286z · Cited by 325
Welker, F., Hajdinjak, M., Talamo, S., Jaouen, K., Dannemann, M., David, F., Julien, M., Meyer, M., Kelso, J., Barnes, I., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1605834113 · Cited by 309
A guide to ancient protein studies
Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Breci, L. A., Tabb, D. L., Yates, J. R., & Wysocki, V. H.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-27
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1963-1971
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2055934103
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.